Literature DB >> 15110457

The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields.

Ann Van Esch1, Tom Depuydt, Dominique Pierre Huyskens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In parallel with the increased use of intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) fields in radiation therapy, flat panel amorphous silicon (aSi) detectors are becoming the standard for online portal imaging at the linear accelerator. In order to minimise the workload related to the quality assurance of the IMRT fields, we have explored the possibility of using a commercially available aSi portal imager for absolute dosimetric verification of the delivery of dynamic IMRT fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the basic dosimetric characteristics of an aSi portal imager (aS500, Varian Medical Systems), using an acquisition mode especially developed for portal dose (PD) integration during delivery of a-static or dynamic-radiation field. Secondly, the dose calculation algorithm of a commercially available treatment planning system (Cadplan, Varian Medical Systems) was modified to allow prediction of the PD image, i.e. to compare the intended fluence distribution with the fluence distribution as actually delivered by the dynamic multileaf collimator. Absolute rather than relative dose prediction was applied. The PD image prediction was compared to the corresponding acquisition for several clinical IMRT fields by means of the gamma evaluation method. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The acquisition mode is accurate in integrating all PD over a wide range of monitor units, provided detector saturation is avoided. Although the dose deposition behaviour in the portal image detector is not equivalent to the dose to water measurements, it is reproducible and self-consistent, lending itself to quality assurance measurements. Gamma evaluations of the predicted versus measured PD distribution were within the pre-defined acceptance criteria for all clinical IMRT fields, i.e. allowing a dose difference of 3% of the local field dose in combination with a distance to agreement of 3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15110457     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  73 in total

1.  A generalized calibration procedure for in vivo transit dosimetry using siemens electronic portal imaging devices.

Authors:  Andrea Fidanzio; Francesca Greco; Laura Gargiulo; Savino Cilla; Domenico Sabatino; Massimo Cappiello; Cinzia Di Felice; Elisabetta Di Castro; Luigi Azario; Mariateresa Russo; Luciano Pompei; Guido D'Onofrio; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Practical guidelines for routine intensity-modulated radiotherapy verification: pre-treatment verification with portal dosimetry and treatment verification with in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  A J Vinall; A J Williams; V E Currie; A Van Esch; D Huyskens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Exit fluence analysis using portal dosimetry in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Prabakar Sukumar; Sriram Padmanaban; Dhanabalan Rajasekaran; Muniyappan Kannan; Vivekanandan Nagarajan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-07-15

4.  Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Aleksandra Grządziel; Wojciech Osewski; Lukasz Dolla; Barbara Bekman; Borislava Petrovic
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  To evaluate the accuracy of dynamic versus static IMRT delivery using portal dosimetry.

Authors:  S Clemente; R Caivano; M Cozzolino; G Califano; C Chiumento; A Fiorentino; V Fusco
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Overestimation of low-dose radiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy with sliding-window technique.

Authors:  Hilke Vorwerk; Daniela Wagner; Björn Seitz; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A Wolff; Clemens F Hess
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Irregular surface compensation for radiotherapy of the breast: correlating depth of the compensation surface with breast size and resultant dose distribution.

Authors:  D J Emmens; H V James
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The Influence of Acquisition Mode on the Dosimetric Performance of an Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer; Sisira Herath; Siva Sarasanandarajah; Tomas Kron; Pradip Deb
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Dose-guided radiotherapy for lung tumors.

Authors:  Angelo Piermattei; Andrea Fidanzio; Savino Cilla; Francesca Greco; Luigi Azario; Domenico Sabatino; Mattia Grusio; Mariella Cozzolino; Vincenzo Fusco
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.