Literature DB >> 15109323

Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions.

Donna M Windish1, Amy M Knight, Scott M Wright.   

Abstract

Understanding how clinician-teachers' self-assessments compare to learners' impressions can serve to help educators place each of these evaluations in the appropriate context. Past participants of the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program and other physician-teachers were surveyed in 2002 regarding their teaching skills and behaviors. We surveyed their learners to compare teacher and learner assessments of teaching proficiency, behaviors, enjoyment, and career satisfaction. In each area, learners' ratings were statistically significantly higher than their teachers' self-ratings. Though it is unclear whether teachers' or learners' assessments are a more accurate reflection of the truth, the more positive learner ratings should promote self-confidence in clinician-educators regarding their teaching abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109323      PMCID: PMC1492334          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of resident and medical student evaluation of faculty teaching.

Authors:  B C Williams; M S Pillsbury; D T Stern; C M Grum
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  The reliability of medical student ratings of clinical teaching.

Authors:  D J Solomon; A J Speer; C J Rosebraugh; D J DiPette
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Self-assessment programs and their implications for health professions training.

Authors:  M J Gordon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Evaluation of clinical instructors by third-year medical students.

Authors:  M B Donnelly; J O Woolliscroft
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Factors affecting ratings of clinical teachers by medical students and residents.

Authors:  D M Irby; G M Gillmore; P G Ramsey
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-01

6.  Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness.

Authors:  P G Ramsey; G M Gillmore; D M Irby
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education: a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  L Arnold; T L Willoughby; E V Calkins
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-01

8.  Residents' perceptions of their teachers: facilitative behaviour and the learning value of rotations.

Authors:  S B Kendrick; J M Simmons; B F Richards; L P Roberge
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine.

Authors:  D Irby; P Rakestraw
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1981-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  An emerging renaissance in medical education.

Authors:  William T Branch; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills.

Authors:  Amy M Knight; Karan A Cole; David E Kern; L Randol Barker; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Milestone-Based Tool for Learner Evaluation of Faculty Clinical Teaching.

Authors:  Karyn Kassis; Rebecca Wallihan; Larry Hurtubise; Sara Goode; Margaret Chase; John D Mahan
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2017-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.