Literature DB >> 10183328

The reliability of medical student ratings of clinical teaching.

D J Solomon1, A J Speer, C J Rosebraugh, D J DiPette.   

Abstract

This study estimated the interrater reliability of medical student evaluations of clinical teaching. Data consisted of 1,570 ratings evaluating 147 faculty over a 4-year period in a 3rd-year internal medicine clerkship. The number of ratings a typical faculty member receives in a year was also calculated and used to extrapolate the standard error of measurement for data typically available to evaluate faculty at different time intervals. The data available to evaluate a faculty member after 1 year was not adequate, but improved substantially at the 5- to 7-year mark, when a faculty member is typically evaluated for promotion and tenure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10183328     DOI: 10.1177/016327879702000306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  11 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Amit K Ghosh; David A Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions.

Authors:  Donna M Windish; Amy M Knight; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; David A Cook; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Implementing an Institution-wide Resident-as-Teacher Program: Successes and Challenges.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Yu; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

5.  Problem-Based Learning in Anesthesiology: An Evaluative Study of a Medical Student Clerkship.

Authors:  D W Musick; C L Montgomery; N W Pedigo
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  1999-05-01

Review 6.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Evaluating Emergency Medicine Faculty at End-of-Shift.

Authors:  Regina A Kovach; David L Griffen; Mark L Francis
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-12

8.  Systematic evaluation of the teaching qualities of Obstetrics and Gynecology faculty: reliability and validity of the SETQ tools.

Authors:  Renée van der Leeuw; Kiki Lombarts; Maas Jan Heineman; Onyebuchi Arah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

10.  Voluntary vs. compulsory student evaluation of clerkships: effect on validity and potential bias.

Authors:  Sola Aoun Bahous; Pascale Salameh; Angelique Salloum; Wael Salameh; Yoon Soo Park; Ara Tekian
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.