Literature DB >> 15104827

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse.

Pierre Gadonneix1, Alfredo Ercoli, Delphine Salet-Lizée, Odile Cotelle, Brigitte Bolner, Michel Van Den Akker, Richard Villet.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls in correcting multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING: Tertiary care university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-six consecutive women with radiologic diagnosis of multicompartment POP with or without genuine stress urinary incontinence and no history of surgery for either disorder. INTERVENTION: LSC with or without laparoscopic Burch colposuspension or tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: LSC was performed in 89% of patients. Mean operating and hospitalization times were 171 +/- 37 minutes and 4.0 +/- 2.1 days, respectively. Intraoperative complications were 7% of bladder injuries successfully treated by laparoscopic suture. The success rate for POP was 83%. The main recurrence was rectocele (12%), which occurred only among women undergoing LSC plus laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (P = 0.036). The LSC was effective in treating symptoms in 95% of women. Because of excessive mesh tension, one patient (2%) developed obstructed defecation, and two (5%) had de novo urinary incontinence. In no patient did occlusion or mesh infection and/or erosion in adjacent organs occur.
CONCLUSION: LSC appears to be feasible and effective in treatment of multicompartment POP. Performing concomitant Burch colposuspension significantly enhances the risk of rectocele recurrence or development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104827     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  29 in total

1.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

3.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

Review 4.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh.

Authors:  P Xiromeritis; M L Marotta; N Royer; I Kalogiannidis; P Degeest; F Devos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

7.  Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  A Germain; F Thibault; M Galifet; M-L Scherrer; A Ayav; J Hubert; L Brunaud; L Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jasper Verguts; Erika Werbrouck; Joan Veldman; Paul Lewi; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Carolin Eva Hach; Joschka Krude; Andre Reitz; Michael Reiter; Axel Haferkamp; Stephan Buse
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Preoperative quality of life questionnaires are an adequate tool to select women with genital prolapse for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Enora Laas; Mattieu Haddad; Joël Muhlstein; Sofiane Bendifallah; Marcos Ballester; Emile Darai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.