Literature DB >> 25851586

Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Carolin Eva Hach1, Joschka Krude, Andre Reitz, Michael Reiter, Axel Haferkamp, Stephan Buse.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Robotic assistance simplifies laparoscopic procedures. We hypothesize that robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy is a rapid and safe procedure with satisfying short-term and midterm functional results.
METHODS: After informed consent, we enrolled 101 consecutive patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy at Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany. After a median follow-up of 22 months, we assessed midterm functional results as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included surgical duration, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications. We described frequencies as counts (percent) and continuous data as median [interquartile range (Q1-Q3)] or mean [standard deviation (SD)], as appropriate.
RESULTS: We enrolled 101 patients. The mean age was 69 years (SD 11); 75 women (74.3 %) had undergone previous abdominal surgery. Among the patients, 95 (94.1 %) presented with anterior vaginal wall prolapse Baden-Walker grade 2-3, 74 (73.3 %) vaginal vault prolapse, and 9 (8.9 %) concomitant rectocele. Fifty (50 %) patients underwent a modified Burch procedure in addition to sacrocolpopexy. The median surgical duration was 96 min (Q1-Q3 83-130). There were six (5.9 %) minor intraoperative complications but no conversions to open surgery. Postoperatively, we registered five (4.9 %) Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, three (3.0 %) grade II complications, and one (1.0 %) grade III complication. After a median follow-up of 22 months (Q1-Q3 12-49), the patients reported significant decreased impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life as well as bother resulting from POP symptoms. The overall success rate, defined as none or minor impact of POP on quality of life, was 75 %.
CONCLUSIONS: In this single-surgeon study, robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy was a safe and rapidly performed procedure that achieved good medium-term functional results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851586     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2688-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  24 in total

1.  Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; Amy E Krambeck; George K Chow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Chandru P Sundaram; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; Jaime Landman; Carl G Klutke
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Giorgio Bogani; Paola Sorice; Andrea Braga; Marco Torella; Stefano Salvatore; Stefano Uccella; Antonella Cromi; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections.

Authors:  K M Luber; S Boero; J Y Choe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A validated self-administered female pelvic floor questionnaire.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Sheila M O'Neill; Christopher F Maher; Diana Battistutta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  What's new in prolapse surgery?

Authors:  Bruno Deval; François Haab
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh.

Authors:  Patrick J Culligan; Emil Gurshumov; Christa Lewis; Jennifer L Priestley; Jodie Komar; Nihar Shah; Charbel G Salamon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Karen Jong; Ted Klein; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-10-04

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Schachar; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.