Literature DB >> 18536861

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Dimitri Sarlos1, Sonja Brandner, LaVonne Kots, Nicolle Gygax, Gabriel Schaer.   

Abstract

Our prospective study evaluates laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse focusing on perioperative data, objective anatomical results using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and postoperative quality of life using the Kings Health questionnaire. One hundred one patients completed the study. Fifty five had laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy for uterine prolapse and 46 had laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy prolapse. Median follow-up was 12 months. The subjective cure rate was 93% the objective cure rate (no prolapse in any compartment) according to the International Continence Society classification of prolapse was 98%. The main site of objective recurrence (6%) was the anterior compartment. No apical recurrences and no vaginal mesh erosion occurred. Postoperatively overall quality of life and sexual quality showed significant improvement with less than 1% de-novo dyspareunia. The procedure is recommended for experienced laparoscopic surgeons because of severe intraoperative complications like bladder or rectal injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536861     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0657-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  27 in total

1.  Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse.

Authors:  A Wattiez; M Canis; G Mage; J L Pouly; M A Bruhat
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Surgical management of the apical vaginal defect.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.

Authors:  C Maher; K Baessler; C M A Glazener; E J Adams; S Hagen
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 5.  Mesh augmentation during pelvic-floor reconstructive surgery: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Christopher F Maher
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  P J Higgs; H-L Chua; A R B Smith
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Eric Mandron; Carlos Arroyo; Henry Andrews; Xavier Cathelineau; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Sonographic evaluation of the bladder neck in continent and stress-incontinent women.

Authors:  G N Schaer; D Perucchini; E Munz; U Peschers; O R Koechli; J O Delancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Improvement of perineal sonographic bladder neck imaging with ultrasound contrast medium.

Authors:  G N Schaer; O R Koechli; B Schuessler; U Haller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  35 in total

1.  Anorectal symptoms before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpoperineopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Rajeev Ramanah; Marcos Ballester; Elisabeth Chereau; Charles Bui; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh.

Authors:  P Xiromeritis; M L Marotta; N Royer; I Kalogiannidis; P Degeest; F Devos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

5.  Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  A Germain; F Thibault; M Galifet; M-L Scherrer; A Ayav; J Hubert; L Brunaud; L Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; LaVonne Kots; Gloria Ryu; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with deep attachment of anterior and posterior mesh.

Authors:  Sarlos Dimitri; Aigmueller Thomas; Schaer Gabriel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Fikret Fatih Onol; Erdal Kaya; Osman Köse; Sinasi Yavuz Onol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?

Authors:  R Hausammann; T Steffen; D Weishaupt; U Beutner; F H Hetzer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  The vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Stavros Athanasiou; Themos Grigoriadis; Ioannis Chatzipapas; Athanasios Protopapas; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.