Literature DB >> 19479177

Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Filip Claerhout1, Jan Paul Roovers, Paul Lewi, Jasper Verguts, Dirk De Ridder, Jan Deprest.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to describe the learning curve of a single surgeon to achieve the ability to perform a complication-free and anatomically successful laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC).
METHODS: All patients, from the first LSC onwards (1996) were included. Outcome measures were operation time, number of laparotomies, complications and anatomical failures within 3 months. Learning curves were generated using moving average method (MOA) and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess changes in respectively operation time and failures (laparotomy, complication or anatomical failure).
RESULTS: Of the 206 patients, 83% were completed by laparoscopy. The intra-operative and major respectively minor post-operative complication rates were 2.4% (n = 5), 4.4% (n = 9) and 12.6% (n = 26). CUSUM analysis showed adequate learning after 60 cases. MOA showed that operation time declined rapidly during the first 30 procedures reaching a steady state (175 min) after 90 cases. Complications remained unchanged throughout the series.
CONCLUSIONS: LSC was associated with a low complication rate but a long learning curve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19479177     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0914-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  29 in total

Review 1.  Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Learning laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  C Altgassen; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?

Authors:  P Antiphon; S Elard; A Benyoussef; M Fofana; R Yiou; M Gettman; A Hoznek; D Vordos; D K Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Choi; Woon Kyung Jeong; Sang-Woo Lim; Tae Sung Chung; Jung-In Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Byung-Ho Nam; Hee Jin Chang; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Eric Mandron; Carlos Arroyo; Henry Andrews; Xavier Cathelineau; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; R Cadoni; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients.

Authors:  Cécile Rivoire; Revaz Botchorishvili; Michel Canis; Kris Jardon; Benoit Rabischong; Arnaud Wattiez; Gérard Mage
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Patrick J Culligan; Miles Murphy; Linda Blackwell; Grant Hammons; Carol Graham; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The extended learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication: a cohort analysis of 400 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Gill; M I Booth; J Stratford; T C B Dehn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  16 in total

1.  Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Mallika Anand; Amy L Weaver; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; Emanuel C Trabuco; John A Occhino; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Twenty years of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: where are we now?

Authors:  Boris Gabriel; Joseph Nassif; Sonia Barata; Arnaud Wattiez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.

Authors:  B Lu; A M Smallwood; T A Sellers; J S Drukteinis; J J Heine; E E E Fowler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice.

Authors:  Robert Moore; Christopher Moriarty; Orawee Chinthakanan; John Miklos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  A new affordable and easy-to-make pelvic model for training in complex urogynecological laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Tamara Serdinšek; Branka Žegura Andrić; Igor But
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta; Frank Van der Aa; Alfredo L Milani; Jan Den Boon; Filip Claerhout; Jan-Paul Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount.

Authors:  Michael Moen; Michael Noone; Brett Vassallo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: identification of challenging steps.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jasper Verguts; Erika Werbrouck; Joan Veldman; Paul Lewi; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.

Authors:  Vani Dandolu; Megumi Akiyama; Gayle Allenback; Prathamesh Pathak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.