Literature DB >> 22806530

Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

A Germain1, F Thibault, M Galifet, M-L Scherrer, A Ayav, J Hubert, L Brunaud, L Bresler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and long-term results of pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the Da Vinci robotic system.
METHODS: During a 7-year period, 52 consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse underwent robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: All but two of the procedures were successfully completed robotically (96 %). Median operative time was 190 (range, 75-340) mins. There was no mortality and no specific morbidity due to the robotic approach. Mean hospital stay was 5 days. The median follow-up was 42 months. Five recurrent prolapses (9.6 %) were diagnosed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that using the Da-Vinci robotic system is feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with good long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806530     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2472-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory?

Authors:  P Antiphon; S Elard; A Benyoussef; M Fofana; R Yiou; M Gettman; A Hoznek; D Vordos; D K Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; Amy E Krambeck; George K Chow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis.

Authors:  Jesús Moreno Sierra; Elena Ortiz Oshiro; Cristina Fernandez Pérez; Isabel Galante Romo; Javier Corral Rosillo; Sara Prieto Nogal; Ignacio T Castillon Vela; Angel Silmi Moyano; J Alvarez Fernandez-Represa
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  [Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients].

Authors:  M Cosson; E Bogaert; F Narducci; D Querleu; G Crépin
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2000-12

5.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mark T C Wong; Guillaume Meurette; Jerome Rigaud; Nicolas Regenet; Paul-Antoine Lehur
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The development of a national database of the results of surgery for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Sigurd Kulseng-Hanssen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients.

Authors:  Cécile Rivoire; Revaz Botchorishvili; Michel Canis; Kris Jardon; Benoit Rabischong; Arnaud Wattiez; Gérard Mage
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Ellen Borstad; Michael Abdelnoor; Anne Cathrine Staff; Sigurd Kulseng-Hanssen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Maria Lee; Bo Wook Kim; Yongil Kwon
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic vaginal vault suspension compared to abdominal or vaginal approaches for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hanhan Li; Jesse Sammon; Florian Roghmann; Akshay Sood; Michael Ehlert; Maxine Sun; Mani Menon; Humphrey Atiemo; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single Center Experience in China.

Authors:  Ke Niu; Qingzhi Zhai; Wensheng Fan; Li'an Li; Wen Yang; Mingxia Ye; Yuanguang Meng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  Robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Teresa L Danforth; Monish Aron; David A Ginsberg
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.