Literature DB >> 15101693

Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria.

Oliver Y Martin1, David J Hosken, Paul I Ward.   

Abstract

Whether sexual selection increases or decreases female fitness is determined by the occurrence and relative importance of sexual-conflict processes and the ability of females to choose high-quality males. Experimentally enforced polyandry and monogamy have previously been shown to cause rapid evolution in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. Flies from polyandrous lines invested more in reproductive tissue, and this investment influenced paternity in sperm competition, but came at a cost to immune function. While some fitness consequences of enforced polyandry or monogamy have been examined when flies mate multiply, the consequences for female fitness when singly copulated remain unexplored. Under a good-genes scenario females from polyandrous lines should be of higher general quality and should outperform females from monogamous lines even with a single copulation. Under sexual conflict, costly adaptations will afford no advantages when females are allowed to mate only once. We investigate the lifetime reproductive success and longevity of females evolving under enforced monogamy or polyandry when mating once with males from these selection regimes. Females from polyandrous lines were found to have lower fitness than their monogamous counterparts when mating once. They died earlier and produced significantly fewer eggs and offspring. These results suggest that sexual conflict probably drove evolution under enforced polyandry as female fitness did not increase overall as expected with purely good-genes effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15101693      PMCID: PMC1691601          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

3.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment.

Authors:  Brett Holland
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young.

Authors:  D J Hosken; T W J Garner; T Tregenza; N Wedell; P I Ward
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 8.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences.

Authors:  M Kirkpatrick; N H Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.).

Authors:  P I Ward
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  10 in total

1.  Adaptive male effects on female ageing in seed beetles.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Natacha Kremer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Ageing and the evolution of female resistance to remating in seed beetles.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Natacha Kremer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The karyotype of the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria, a model organism in studies of sexual selection.

Authors:  Sonja H Sbilordo; Oliver Y Martin; Paul I Ward
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 5.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolutionary insight from a humble fly: sperm competition and the yellow dungfly.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Geoff A Parker; David J Hosken
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The evolution of monogamy is associated with reversals from male to female bias in the survival cost of parasitism.

Authors:  Tyler N Wittman; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Modelling the impact of targeted anthelmintic treatment of cattle on dung fauna.

Authors:  Andrew S Cooke; Eric R Morgan; Jennifer A J Dungait
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.860

9.  Environmental quality alters female costs and benefits of evolving under enforced monogamy.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Marco Demont; Łukasz Michalczyk; Matthew J G Gage; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Enforced monoandry over generations induces a reduction of female investment into reproduction in a promiscuous bird.

Authors:  Gabriele Sorci; Loïc Lesobre; Pauline Vuarin; Gwènaëlle Levêque; Michel Saint Jalme; Frédéric Lacroix; Yves Hingrat
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.