Literature DB >> 16271973

Adaptive male effects on female ageing in seed beetles.

Alexei A Maklakov1, Natacha Kremer, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

Selection can favour the evolution of a high reproductive rate early in life even when this results in a subsequent increase in the rate of mortality, because selection is relatively weak late in life. However, the optimal reproductive schedule of a female may be suboptimal to any one of her mates, and males may thus be selected to modulate female reproductive rate. Owing to such sexual conflict, coevolution between males and females may contribute to the evolution of senescence. By using replicated beetle populations selected for reproduction at an early or late age, we show that males evolve to affect senescence in females in a manner consistent with the genetic interests of males. 'Late' males evolved to decelerate senescence and increase the lifespan of control females, relative to 'early' males. Our findings demonstrate that adaptive evolution in one sex may involve its effects on senescence in the other, showing that the evolution of optimal life histories in one sex may be either facilitated or constrained by genes expressed in the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271973      PMCID: PMC1599781          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  A delayed wave of death from reproduction in Drosophila.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; L Partridge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: female mating frequency as a correlated response.

Authors:  C M Sgrò; G Geddes; K Fowler; L Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy.

Authors:  Oliver Y Martin; David J Hosken
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Decline in offspring viability as a manifestation of aging in Drosophila melianogaster.

Authors:  S Kern; M Ackermann; S C Stearns; T J Kawecki
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Why do life spans differ? Partitioning mean longevity differences in terms of age-specific mortality parameters.

Authors:  S D Pletcher; A A Khazaeli; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 9.  Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Chapman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 10.  Deciphering death: a commentary on Gompertz (1825) 'On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies'.

Authors:  Thomas B L Kirkwood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ageing and the evolution of female resistance to remating in seed beetles.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Natacha Kremer; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Ejaculate components delay reproductive senescence while elevating female reproductive rate in an insect.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt; Richard A Naylor; Michael T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Female, but not male, nematodes evolve under experimental sexual coevolution.

Authors:  K Fritzsche; N Timmermeyer; M Wolter; N K Michiels
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets.

Authors:  Felix Zajitschek; John Hunt; Susanne R K Zajitschek; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Accurate Alternative Measurements for Female Lifetime Reproductive Success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Trinh T X Nguyen; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-dependent female responses to a male ejaculate signal alter demographic opportunities for selection.

Authors:  Claudia Fricke; Darrell Green; Walter E Mills; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.