Literature DB >> 15082901

Minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Yu-Duk Choi1, Soon-Pyo Lee, Young-Won Cha, Jang Yeul Choi.   

Abstract

Endoscopic hysterectomy is increasingly selected as a current trend to minimize invasion, tissue trauma and early recovery. However it has disadvantages of the difficulty to learn and needs expensive equipments. So we developed a new minimally invasive method of vaginal hysterectomy-minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (MAVH) in order to complement the current laparoscopic surgery. The principle of MAVH is based on suprapubic minilaparotomical incision and uterine elevator that allows access and maximal exposure of the pelvic anatomy and an easy approach to the surrounding anatomy enabling division of round ligaments, Fallopian tubes, tuboovarian ligaments, and dissection of bladder peritoneum. After then, the vaginal phase of MAVH is done by the traditional vaginal hysterectomy. We enrolled 75 consecutive cases and in 73 cases thereof MAVH was accomplished successfully. The technique of MAVH is simple and easy to learn and it involves a small incision causing less pain and complications. This practice does not require expensive equipments. MAVH is considered as a safe and effective alternative method for abdominal hysterectomy in most cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082901      PMCID: PMC2822309          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  F Nezhat; C Nezhat; S Gordon; E Wilkins
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy: a statistical model for determining physician decision making and patient outcome.

Authors:  S R Kovac; S J Christie; G A Bindbeutel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Vaginal hysterectomy: is previous pelvic operation a contraindication?

Authors:  C B Coulam; J H Pratt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-05-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Simplifying laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  N Johnson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-03

5.  On patient need, equity, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Decrease in the number of abdominal hysterectomies after introduction of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  E A Robertson; S de Blok
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2000-11

7.  Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Mirhashemi; B L Harlow; E S Ginsburg; L B Signorello; R Berkowitz; S Feldman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  G M Boike; E P Elfstrand; G DelPriore; D Schumock; H S Holley; J R Lurain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  R L Summitt; T G Stovall; G H Lipscomb; F W Ling
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.