Literature DB >> 8317510

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.

G M Boike1, E P Elfstrand, G DelPriore, D Schumock, H S Holley, J R Lurain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to critically review the indications, outcomes, complications, and costs of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: The operating room log was reviewed to determine the number and route of hysterectomies performed over a 1-year period. The charts of 50 consecutive laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 50 vaginal hysterectomies were reviewed. Charts from 50 selected abdominal hysterectomies were also reviewed. Information on patient characteristics, indications, complications, uterine weights, hospital stay, and patient costs were obtained and analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 509 hysterectomies, 82 were performed as laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies and 73 as vaginal hysterectomies. The patient characteristics and indications of the laparoscopically assisted group more closely matched those of the abdominal hysterectomy group. The complication rate in the laparoscopically assisted group was intermediate between the other two groups, but the hospital stay was significantly less. Patient cost for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy was significantly greater than either abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy, in spite of the shortened hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy offers a technique to convert some abdominal hysterectomies into vaginal hysterectomies. It appears particularly useful when an adnexal indication for surgery exists. Uterine leiomyoma does not appear to be an indication for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The costs are significant because of increased operating time and costs of disposable equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8317510     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90679-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kong; Kyung Mi Lee; Ji Yoon Cheong; Woo Young Kim; Suk-Joon Chang; Seung-Chul Yoo; Jong-Hyuck Yoon; Ki-Hong Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

3.  Laparoscopically-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  W A Saleh; C Nezhat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-08

4.  Minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Duk Choi; Soon-Pyo Lee; Young-Won Cha; Jang Yeul Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  [Uterine myoma: modalities and indications for coelioscopic treatment].

Authors:  C Chapron; J B Dubuisson; X Chavet; V Aubert; P Morice; F X Aubriot; H Foulot
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.

Authors:  Rakesh Sinha; Meenakshi Sundaram; Smita Lakhotia; Chaitali Mahajan; Gayatri Manaktala; Parul Shah
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2009-01

7.  A novel technique of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for routine use: evaluation of 140 cases.

Authors:  S P Puntambekar; G N Wagh; S S Puntambekar; R M Sathe; M A Kulkarni; M A Kashyap; A M Patil; Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.