Literature DB >> 1448255

Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting.

R L Summitt1, T G Stovall, G H Lipscomb, F W Ling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outpatient laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard outpatient vaginal hysterectomy.
METHODS: Fifty-six women scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to undergo either a laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with endoscopic staples (N = 29) or a standard vaginal hysterectomy (N = 27). There were no differences between the study groups with regard to age, gravidity, parity, preoperative indications, and previous operations.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 29 laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and all 27 vaginal hysterectomies were completed without incident. When indicated, unilateral or bilateral oophorectomies were completed. The mean operating time was significantly longer for laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (120.1 versus 64.7 minutes). Fifty-three of the 55 patients completing surgery were discharged home by 12 hours from the time of admission. Complications with laparoscopic hysterectomy were related to the technical aspects of laparoscopy. The incidence of febrile morbidity was similar in the groups. Although patients having laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomy required statistically significantly more pain medication and had lower postoperative hematocrit measurements, this did not make a clinical difference in the postoperative courses. The mean hospital charge for laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy was $7905 and for vaginal hysterectomy $4891.
CONCLUSION: Other than cost, laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and standard vaginal hysterectomy appear comparable in patients who could otherwise undergo a vaginal hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1448255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  21 in total

Review 1.  Natural orifice hysterectomy.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Michael B Noone; Denise M Elser
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-11

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Gian A Binda; Alessandro Montedori; Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Cirocchi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-25

3.  Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Michael D Moen; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopically-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  W A Saleh; C Nezhat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-08

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An economic perspective.

Authors:  C E Scott-Conner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

7.  Minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Duk Choi; Soon-Pyo Lee; Young-Won Cha; Jang Yeul Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas M Shultz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-28

9.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

Review 10.  [Uterine myoma: modalities and indications for coelioscopic treatment].

Authors:  C Chapron; J B Dubuisson; X Chavet; V Aubert; P Morice; F X Aubriot; H Foulot
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.