Literature DB >> 15069215

Physician performance information and consumer choice: a survey of subjects with the freedom to choose between doctors.

S-H Cheng1, H-Y Song.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing efforts have been made to provide information to help consumers to select a healthcare provider, but the public release of hospital performance data has had only a limited impact on consumer choice.
OBJECTIVES: To understand the experience of consumers in searching for physician performance information and to investigate the potential impact on their propensity to change doctors if hypothetically provided with physician specific performance information.
DESIGN: A nationwide telephone interview survey using a structured questionnaire.
SETTING: The survey was conducted in Taiwan, a country with a universal health insurance programme where residents are free to choose between physicians for any medical consultation. PARTICIPANTS: 4015 adults aged over 20 years contacted by random digit dialling telephone calls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects were asked (1). if they have ever compared the quality of care provided by physicians in their area; (2). if they would consult a performance report if it was available; and (3). if they would change doctors on the basis of information provided in the report.
RESULTS: Approximately half the subjects had made comparisons between doctors; 73% stated that they would consult a performance report if it was available, and 77% were prepared to change doctors if their doctor performed badly in the report.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing physician specific performance reports to the public may be viewed favourably by consumers of health care and have a significant impact on physician selection and hence quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15069215      PMCID: PMC1743817          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2003.006981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  20 in total

1.  Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?

Authors:  M Spranca; D E Kanouse; M Elliott; P F Short; D O Farley; R D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference?

Authors:  H H Schauffler; J K Mordavsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

4.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Providing consumers with information about the quality of health plans: the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans demonstration in Washington State.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; A M Epstein; A Zaslavsky; J A Shaul; D Veroff; F J Fowler; P D Cleary
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2000-07

6.  Quality information and consumer health plan choices.

Authors:  Nancy Dean Beaulieu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Reporting of CAHPS quality information to medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  E Goldstein; J Fyock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Increasing the impact of health plan report cards by addressing consumers' concerns.

Authors:  J H Hibbard; L Harris-Kojetin; P Mullin; J Lubalin; S Garfinkel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation.

Authors:  D B Mukamel; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2001-01

10.  Hospital quality information for patients in Taiwan: can they understand it?

Authors:  Shou-Hsia Cheng; Yi-Chen Ho; Kuo-Piao Chung
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.038

View more
  14 in total

1.  The volume-outcome relationship in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Hao-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Health Care Self-Advocacy Strategies for Negotiating Health Care Environments: Analysis of Recommendations by Satisfied Consumers with SCI and SCI Practitioners.

Authors:  Bethlyn Houlihan; Miriam Brody; Andrea Plant; Sarah Everhart Skeels; Judi Zazula; Diana Pernigotti; Christa Green; Stathis Hasiotis; Alan Jette
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

3.  Volume-outcome associations after major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a nationwide Taiwan study.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lu; Chong-Chi Chiu; Jhi-Joung Wang; Yu-Hsien Chiu; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  What Influences Patients' Decisions When Choosing a Health Care Provider? Measuring Preferences of Patients with Knee Arthrosis, Chronic Depression, or Alzheimer's Disease, Using Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Stef Groenewoud; N Job A Van Exel; Ana Bobinac; Marc Berg; Robbert Huijsman; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Survival rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved by high caseload volume: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Tze-Ta Huang; Moon-Sing Lee; Yu-Chieh Su; Pesus Chou; Shih-Hsuan Hsiao; Wen-Yen Chiou; Hon-Yi Lin; Sou-Hsin Chien; Shih-Kai Hung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Multivariate analyses to assess the effects of surgeon and hospital volume on cancer survival rates: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chang; Kuang-Yung Huang; Ta-Wen Hsu; Yu-Chieh Su; Wei-Zhen Yang; Ting-Chang Chen; Pesus Chou; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; Jane R Mort
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; David A Mott; Kenneth D Croes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Outcome disparities between medical personnel and nonmedical personnel patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chia-Jen Liu; Nicole Huang; Chun-Chi Lin; Yu-Ting Lee; Yu-Wen Hu; Chiu-Mei Yeh; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Yiing-Jenq Chou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Association between provider volume and healthcare expenditures of patients with oral cancer in Taiwan: a population-based study.

Authors:  Li-Fu Chen; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Yu-Chieh Su; Moon-Sing Lee; Shih-Kai Hung; Pesus Chou; Ching-Chieh J Lee; Li-Chu Lin; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.