Literature DB >> 11274512

Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference?

H H Schauffler1, J K Mordavsky.   

Abstract

The public release of health care-quality data into more formalized consumer health report cards is intended to educate consumers, improve quality of care, and increase competition in the marketplace The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence on the impact of consumer report cards on the behavior of consumers, providers, and purchasers. Studies were selected by conducting database searches in Medline and Healthstar to identify papers published since 1995 in peer-review journals pertaining to consumer report cards on health care. The evidence indicates that consumer report cards do not make a difference in decision making, improvement of quality, or competition. The research to date suggests that perhaps we need to rethink the entire endeavor of consumer report cards. Consumers desire information that is provider specific and may be more likely to use information on rates of errors and adverse outcomes. Purchasers may be in a better position to understand and use information about health plan quality to select high-quality plans to offer consumers and to design premium contributions to steer consumers, through price, to the highest-quality plans.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274512     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  28 in total

1.  Provider competition and health care quality: challenges and opportunities for research.

Authors:  Herbert S Wong; Peggy McNamara; Warren Greenberg
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

2.  Physician performance information and consumer choice: a survey of subjects with the freedom to choose between doctors.

Authors:  S-H Cheng; H-Y Song
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

3.  Experience with health coach-mediated physician referral in an employed insured population.

Authors:  Karen Donelan; Sowmya R Rao; Robert S Rogers; Johanna R Mailhot; Robert Galvin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Public reporting of nursing home quality of care: lessons from the United States experience for canadian policy discussion.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Kellie Draper; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

5.  Do report cards influence hospital choice? The case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care.

Authors:  Jochen Profit; Katri V Typpo; Sylvia J Hysong; LeChauncy D Woodard; Michael A Kallen; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Providing patients web-based data to inform physician choice: if you build it, will they come?

Authors:  Gary Fanjiang; Ted von Glahn; Hong Chang; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Demand-driven care and hospital choice. Dutch health policy toward demand-driven care: results from a survey into hospital choice.

Authors:  Christiaan J Lako; Pauline Rosenau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-07-19

10.  A Qualitative Study of Vulnerable Patient Views of Type 2 Diabetes Consumer Reports.

Authors:  Daniel R Longo; Benjamin F Crabtree; Maria B Pellerano; Jenna Howard; Barry Saver; Edward L Hannan; Justin Lee; Michael T Lundberg; Roy Sabo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.