Stef Groenewoud 1 , N Job A Van Exel 2 , Ana Bobinac 2,3 , Marc Berg 4 , Robbert Huijsman 2 , Elly A Stolk 2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate what influences patients' health care decisions and what the implications are for the provision of information on the quality of health care providers to patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Dutch patient samples between November 2006 and February 2007. STUDY DESIGN: Discrete choice experiments were conducted in three patient groups to explore what influences choice for health care providers. DATA COLLECTION: Data were obtained from 616 patients with knee arthrosis, 368 patients with chronic depression, and 421 representatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The three patients groups chose health care providers on a different basis. The most valued attributes were effectiveness and safety (knee arthrosis); continuity of care and relationship with the therapist (chronic depression); and expertise (Alzheimer's disease). Preferences differed between subgroups, mainly in relation to patients' choice profiles, severity of disease, and some background characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is substantial room for (quality) information about health care providers in patients' decision processes. This information should be tailor-made, targeting specific patient segments, because different actors and factors play a part in their search and selection process. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate what influences patients ' health care decisions and what the implications are for the provision of information on the quality of health care providers to patients . DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Dutch patient samples between November 2006 and February 2007. STUDY DESIGN: Discrete choice experiments were conducted in three patient groups to explore what influences choice for health care providers. DATA COLLECTION: Data were obtained from 616 patients with knee arthrosis , 368 patients with chronic depression , and 421 representatives of patients with Alzheimer's disease . PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The three patients groups chose health care providers on a different basis. The most valued attributes were effectiveness and safety (knee arthrosis ); continuity of care and relationship with the therapist (chronic depression ); and expertise (Alzheimer's disease ). Preferences differed between subgroups, mainly in relation to patients ' choice profiles, severity of disease, and some background characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is substantial room for (quality) information about health care providers in patients ' decision processes. This information should be tailor-made, targeting specific patient segments, because different actors and factors play a part in their search and selection process. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Quality indicators; discrete choice experiment; health services research; patient preferences; quality assurance
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2015
PMID: 26768957 PMCID: PMC4693843 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Serv Res ISSN: 0017-9124 Impact factor: 3.402