Literature DB >> 15064894

The contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return.

R S Coward1, E Poliakoff, D J O'Boyle, C Lowe.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to slowed responses to targets presented at the same location as a preceding stimulus. IOR is typically investigated using a cue-target design, in which subjects respond only to the second stimulus of a pair. In such tasks, the measurement of 'true' IOR may be confounded by the effect of non-ocular response inhibition, because the participant must suppress any tendency to respond (e.g. key press) to the first stimulus. This confound may be eliminated using a target-target design, in which responses are made to both stimuli. We assessed the contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual IOR, measured in a cue-target task, by testing participants on both cue-target and target-target detection tasks, with identical timings and stimuli. Significant IOR was obtained in both tasks but, at a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 1400 ms, IOR magnitude was significantly greater in the cue-target condition than in the target-target condition. However, at an SOA of 1800 ms, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of IOR between the two tasks. Thus, a proportion of the total IOR effect observed in visual cue-target tasks can be attributed to non-ocular response inhibition, but this process appears to decay more rapidly than does 'true' IOR, having dissipated by 1800 ms following cue onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15064894     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1803-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.

Authors:  T L Taylor; R M Klein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response.

Authors:  E Poliakoff; C Spence; D J O'Boyle; F P McGlone; F W J Cody
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return.

Authors:  G Tassinari; D Campara; C Benedetti; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory frequency-based inhibition differs from spatial IOR.

Authors:  David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

6.  Inhibition of return following an auditory cue. The role of central reorienting events.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

8.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks?

Authors:  K M Terry; L A Valdes; W T Neill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

10.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inhibition of return and response repetition within and between modalities.

Authors:  Alexa B Roggeveen; David J Prime; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Sara C Steenrod; James W Bisley; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

4.  Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attentional bias toward cigarette cues in active smokers.

Authors:  Vicki W Chanon; Chandler R Sours; Charlotte A Boettiger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.