Literature DB >> 9497142

Inhibition of return following an auditory cue. The role of central reorienting events.

C Spence1, J Driver.   

Abstract

It is currently controversial whether auditory events produce inhibition of return (IOR). Although some authors argue that this can arise, others propose that peripheral auditory cues do not produce the characteristic IOR pattern of delayed detection latencies for ipsilaterally presented auditory or visual targets, unless a saccade is made to the cued location. We suggest that these previous discrepancies may depend on whether attention is reoriented centrally following the peripheral sound. We presented spatially uninformative peripheral auditory cues prior to visual targets requiring speeded detection responses. IOR was found in the absence of eye movements, provided an auditory reorienting event was presented at central fixation between onset of the peripheral cue and the subsequent target, but not when the central reorienting event was visual. A subsequent experiment demonstrated that auditory IOR between successive targets is similarly significantly reduced in the absence of an appropriate central reorienting event. These results imply that auditory stimuli can induce IOR directly. Previous failures to demonstrate IOR following auditory cues may have been due to an opposing influence of long-lasting attentional facilitation at the cued location, rather than to the putative inability of auditory stimuli to engage oculomotor processes generating IOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9497142     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cross-modal links in spatial attention.

Authors:  J Driver; C Spence
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Multisensory perceptual learning reshapes both fast and slow mechanisms of crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Melissa A Batson; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return.

Authors:  R S Coward; E Poliakoff; D J O'Boyle; C Lowe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Time course of allocation of spatial attention by acoustic cues in non-human primates.

Authors:  Luis C Populin; Abigail Z Rajala
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Developing an EEG-based on-line closed-loop lapse detection and mitigation system.

Authors:  Yu-Te Wang; Kuan-Chih Huang; Chun-Shu Wei; Teng-Yi Huang; Li-Wei Ko; Chin-Teng Lin; Chung-Kuan Cheng; Tzyy-Ping Jung
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Crossmodal semantic congruence can affect visuo-spatial processing and activity of the fronto-parietal attention networks.

Authors:  Serena Mastroberardino; Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.