Literature DB >> 15060460

Long-term functional results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Frédéric Bretagnol1, Hervé Troubat, Christophe Laurent, Frank Zerbib, Jean Saric, Eric Rullier.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A number of patients suffer from gastrointestinal side effects following sphincter-saving resection of the rectum. The aim of this study was to assess frequency and risk factors of long-term gastrointestinal side effects after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1980 and 1997, among 209 patients treated for rectal cancer by rectal resection and sphincter conservation, 145 who were alive without recurrence or colostomy, responded to a questionnaire. There were 85 males and 60 females with a mean age of 64 Years; the follow-up was 5.4 Years. The functional result was considered good if the number of stools per 24h was three or less with normal continence and poor if the number of stools was four or more or if fecal incontinence was present. Influence of age, gender, anastomotic height, type of sutured colon, colonic pouch, defunctioning stoma, leakage, stenosis, radiotherapy, history of irritable bowel syndrome and follow-up were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean anastomotic height was 5 cm from the anal margin. Functional results were good in 56% of patients and poor in 44%. Univariate analysis showed three variables to be significantly associated with the functional results: anastomotic height (P=0.001), radiotherapy (P=0.03) and follow-up > 24 Months (P=0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that only anastomotic height independently influenced functional results. They were good in 76%, 53% and 35% of patients for anastomoses located above 6 cm, between 6 and 3 cm, and below 3 cm from the anal margin, respectively.
CONCLUSION: After sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer, about half of patients have poor long-term functional results, the latter being related only to the anastomotic height. This suggests the need to preserve a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060460     DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(04)94870-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status.

Authors:  Tijmen Koëter; Cynthia S Bonhof; Dounya Schoormans; Ingrid S Martijnse; Barbara S Langenhoff; David D E Zimmerman; Floortje Mols; Daria K Wasowicz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Colorectal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Giacomo Ruffo; Giuliano Barugola; Roberto Rossini; Carlo Augusto Sartori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-06-09

4.  Anterior resection syndrome--a risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Cameron I Wells; Ryash Vather; Michael J J Chu; Jason P Robertson; Ian P Bissett
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The colon J-pouch as a cause of evacuation disorders after rectal resection: myth or fact?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Hauke Lang; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction.

Authors:  Susanne Otto; Anton J Kroesen; Hubert G Hotz; Heinz J Buhr; Martin Kruschewski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Julia Konanz; Florian Herrle; Christel Weiss; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings.

Authors:  Paolo P Bianchi; Chiara Ceriani; Matteo Rottoli; Guido Torzilli; Giovanni Pompili; Alberto Malesci; Monica Ferraroni; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Risk factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Antonella Nicotera; Ezio Falletto; Alberto Arezzo; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Roberto Passera; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.