Literature DB >> 27278551

Colorectal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Giacomo Ruffo1, Giuliano Barugola2, Roberto Rossini3, Carlo Augusto Sartori1.   

Abstract

Improving the quality and effectiveness of care is a key priority of any health policy. The outcomes of health care can be considered as indicators of effectiveness or quality. The scientific literature that evaluates the association between the volume of activity and the outcome of health interventions has greatly developed over the past decade, but, for practical reasons, ethical and social issues, a few randomized controlled studies were made to evaluate this association, although there are numerous observational studies of outcome and systematic reviews of the studies themselves. The colorectal surgery is the most studied area and it represents the ideal testing ground to determine the effectiveness of the quality indicators because of the high incidence of the disease and the wide spread in the territory of the structures that aim to tackle these issues. Numerous studies have documented an association between the large number of colo-rectal surgical procedures and the quality of results. In particular, the volume of activity is one of the characteristics of measurable process that can have a significant impact on the outcome of health care. In conclusion, the ability to use volume thresholds as a proxy for quality is very tempting but it is only part of reality. Infact, the volume-outcome relationship strictly depends on the type of cancer (colon vs rectum) and it appears somehow stronger for the individual surgeon than for the hospital; especially for the 5-year overall survival, operative mortality and number of permanent stoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accreditation; Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Surgical wards; Volumes of surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27278551     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0372-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  21 in total

1.  Single measures of performance do not reflect overall institutional quality in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alex M Almoudaris; Elaine M Burns; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Ara Darzi; Charles Vincent; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  [Surgical procedures volume as an indicator of hospitals and surgeons quality].

Authors:  Daniela Costamagna; Marco Bobbio; Plinio Pinna Pintor
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marit Kressner; Måns Bohe; Björn Cedermark; Michael Dahlberg; Lena Damber; Gudrun Lindmark; Björn Ojerskog; Rune Sjödahl; Robert Johansson; Lars Påhlman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Surgical Unit volume and 30-day reoperation rate following primary resection for colorectal cancer in the Veneto Region (Italy).

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; A Chiappetta; G Giacomazzo; A Barina; N Gennaro; M Rebonato; D Nitti; M Saugo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the discrimination of intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal rectal cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  Matteo Revelli; Francesco Paparo; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Cristina Puppo; Manuele Furnari; Cristina Conforti; Gian Andrea Binda; Edoardo Savarino; Davide Risso; Gian Andrea Rollandi
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Does surgeon case volume influence nonfatal adverse outcomes after rectal cancer resection?

Authors:  Kevin G Billingsley; Arden M Morris; Pamela Green; Jason A Dominitz; Barbara Matthews; Sharon A Dobie; William Barlow; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 7.  Timing of surgery after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jake D Foster; Emma L Jones; Stephen Falk; Edwin J Cooper; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Hierarchical multilevel analysis of increased caseload volume and postoperative outcome after elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E M Burns; A Bottle; A M Almoudaris; R Mamidanna; P Aylin; A Darzi; R J Nicholls; O D Faiz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in Colorectal Surgery Has a Positive Impact on Non-ERAS Liver Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Ismail Labgaa; Ghada Jarrar; Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; Pierre Allemann; Sylvain Gander; Catherine Blanc; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.

Authors:  Jacopo Lenzi; Raffaele Lombardi; Davide Gori; Nicola Zanini; Dario Tedesco; Michele Masetti; Elio Jovine; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopy may decrease morbidity and length of stay after elective colon cancer resection, especially in frail patients: results from an observational real-life study.

Authors:  Carlos Cerdán Santacruz; Matteo Frasson; Blas Flor-Lorente; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Marta Trallero Anoro; Mónica Millán Scheiding; Olga Maseda Díaz; Paula Dujovne Lindenbaum; Andrés Monzón Abad; Eduardo García-Granero Ximenez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Minimum Volume Discussion in the Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer: A Review of the Current Status and Relevance of Surgeon and Hospital Volume regarding Result Quality and the Impact on Health Economics.

Authors:  Karl-Heinrich Link; Peter Coy; Mark Roitman; Carola Link; Marko Kornmann; Ludger Staib
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Hospital volume allocation: integrating decision maker and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Elisabetta Listorti; Arianna Alfieri; Erica Pastore
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  More Favorable Short and Long-Term Outcomes for Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Gaya Spolverato; Giulia Capelli; Jessica Battagello; Andrea Barina; Susi Nordio; Elena Finotti; Isabella Mondi; Corrado Da Lio; Emilio Morpurgo; Josè Adolfo Navarro; Fabio Ceccato; Alessandro Perin; Corrado Pedrazzani; Giulia Turri; Giacomo Zanus; Michela Campi; Marco Massani; Adriana Di Giacomo; Daniela Prando; Ferdinando Agresta; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Manuel Zorzi; Massimo Rugge
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.