Literature DB >> 17520367

Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction.

Susanne Otto1, Anton J Kroesen, Hubert G Hotz, Heinz J Buhr, Martin Kruschewski.   

Abstract

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the recommended method for treatment of cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum. Thus very low anastomoses are necessary to preserve continence, and pouch reconstruction is favored. It is unclear whether the level of anastomosis is important for continence and quality of life in colonic J-pouch reconstruction. In this investigation all patients were included who underwent curative elective anterior continuity resection with colorectal or coloanal J-pouch reconstruction for primary rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and any signs of recurrence at the time of investigation. Evaluation of continence performance by Wexner and Holschneider questionnaire and quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 (EORTC) questionnaires was done 220 +/- 38 days after closure of the protective Ileostomy, which was performed 106 +/- 48 days after primary intervention. Fifty-two patients (79%) were analyzed. Colopouch rectal anastomosis was performed in eighteen cases and colopouch anal anastomosis in thirty-four cases. Fifty percent of the patients in both groups were continent for solid stool. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of incontinence for liquid stool, however. They took stool-regulating medicine more frequently and complained of fecal soiling and a restricted quality of life. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly lower score on the most important points of the QLQ-C30 (emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, and quality of life). The same applied to the QLQ-CR38 for body image and problems with defecation. The quality of life of patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis was still considered acceptable compared with reference data for the normal healthy population, however. Both continence and quality of life are substantially affected by the level of the anastomosis after colonic pouch reconstruction. This suggests preservation of a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible and performing a colopouch rectal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17520367     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-9815-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  28 in total

1.  The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; A te Velde; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Evaluation of anal function after surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Di Matteo; D Mascagni; K P Zeri; A Torretta; F M Di Matteo; A Maturo; N Peparini
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Long-term functional outcome of colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Ichi Hida; Takehito Yoshifuji; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tomohiko Matsuzaki; Toshihiro Uchida; Eizaburou Ishimaru; Tadao Tokoro; Masayuki Yasutomi; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis.

Authors:  K E Matzel; U Stadelmaier; S Muehldorfer; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Function of a colonic J pouch continues to improve with time.

Authors:  G J Harris; I C Lavery; V W Fazio
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum?

Authors:  G Batignani; I Monaci; F Ficari; F Tonelli
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation: functional results related to the level of anastomosis. Clinical and instrumental study.

Authors:  Chiara Montesani; Annamaria Pronio; Sergio Santella; Arianna Boschetto; Daniele Aguzzi; Roberto Pirozzi; Alberto D'Amato; Annatita Vestri
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 May-Jun

9.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients.

Authors:  G Apolone; A Filiberti; S Cifani; R Ruggiata; P Mosconi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  6 in total

1.  Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Dexiang Zhu; Li Liang; Lechi Ye; Qi Lin; Yunshi Zhong; Ye Wei; Li Ren; Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Andrea Altschuler; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  A meta-analysis comparing side to end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M R S Siddiqui; M S Sajid; W G A Woods; E Cheek; M K Baig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?

Authors:  Rosa Digennaro; Mirna Tondo; Filippa Cuccia; Ivana Giannini; Francesco Pezzolla; Marcella Rinaldi; Dario Scala; Giovanni Romano; Donato F Altomare
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shafquat Zaman; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Adewale Adeoba Ayeni; Elizabeth Peterknecht; Sadiq Mawji; Mohamed Albendary; Rajnish Mankotia; Akinfemi Akingboye
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Zerrin Ozgen; Sevgi Ozden; Beste M Atasoy; Hazan Ozyurt; Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Nese Imeryuz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.