Literature DB >> 23571868

Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer--a matched-pair analysis.

Julia Konanz1, Florian Herrle, Christel Weiss, Stefan Post, Peter Kienle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limits for sphincter preservation in rectal cancer have been expanded under the assumption that patients with a permanent colostomy have worse quality of life (QoL). Incontinence and painful defecation are common problems; therefore, this study compares functional outcome and QoL after sphincter-sparing intersphincteric resection (ISR), low anterior resection (LAR), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.
METHODS: From a prospective database, three matched groups of patients after surgery for rectal cancer between 1999 and 2009 were extracted. Median follow-up was 59 months. Of 131 patients receiving a questionnaire, 95 % could be analyzed further. Generic and disease-specific validated QoL (European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer QLQ-C30, CR38) and Wexner incontinence score were used.
RESULTS: Global QoL was comparable between the groups. Physical functioning was significantly better after sphincter preservation surgery than APR (p < 0.05). Symptom scores for diarrhea (DIA) and constipation (CON) were higher after sphincter-preserving surgery (ISR: DIA 45.4, CON 20.2; LAR: DIA 34.1, CON 25.2) compared to APR (DIA 16.6, CON 12.0) (p < 0.05 and <0.01, respectively). Disease-specific QoL assessment showed significantly worse QoL regarding to male sexual function after APR (80.8) than after ISR (53.6) (p < 0.005). Regarding defecation, the ISR group showed significantly higher symptom scores than patients after LAR (p < 0.05). Wexner scores were significantly higher after ISR (12.9) than after LAR (9.5) (p < 0.005).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571868     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1683-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  34 in total

Review 1.  The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Rita Bode; Nicholas Repucci; Janine Becker; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clinical and non-clinical factors influencing postoperative health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T R Wilson; D J Alexander
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Imran Hassan; David W Larson; Robert R Cima; Janette U Gaw; Heidi K Chua; Dieter Hahnloser; John M Stulak; Megan M O'Byrne; Dirk R Larson; Bruce G Wolff; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life.

Authors:  G Barisic; V Markovic; M Popovic; I Dimitrijevic; P Gavrilovic; Z Krivokapic
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy?

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Lei Lian; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Yoori Lee; Sharon L Stein; Larissa K F Temple
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jaana H Vironen; Matti Kairaluoma; Anna-Mari Aalto; Ilmo H Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Quality of life after potentially curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Gabriella Palmer; Anna Martling; Pernilla Lagergren; Björn Cedermark; Torbjörn Holm
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  27 in total

1.  Long-term Outcomes After Surgery Involving the Pelvic Floor in Rectal Cancer: Physical Activity, Quality of Life, and Health Status.

Authors:  Tijmen Koëter; Cynthia S Bonhof; Dounya Schoormans; Ingrid S Martijnse; Barbara S Langenhoff; David D E Zimmerman; Floortje Mols; Daria K Wasowicz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Side-to-end vs. straight stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection: results of randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E G Rybakov; D Yu Pikunov; O Yu Fomenko; S V Chernyshov; Yu A Shelygin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Ke Zhao; Quanlong Liu; Shuhui Yin; Guangzuan Zhuo; Yujuan Zhao; Jun Zhu; Jianhua Ding
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Factors influencing changing bowel habits in patients undergoing sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hyeonju Jeong; JeongYun Park
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.

Authors:  Jin Cheon Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Joon Woo Bong; Ji Hyun Seo; Chan Wook Kim; Seong Ho Park; Jihoon Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Quality of Life and Functional Outcome After Transanal Abdominal Transanal Proctectomy for Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  John H Marks; Jean F Salem; Elsa B Valsdottir; Shadi S Yarandi; Gerald J Marks
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Anorectal functional outcome following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Li-Guo Liu; Xue-Bing Yan; Ze-Zhi Shan; Lei-Lei Yan; Chun-Yu Jiang; Jia Zhou; Yuan Tian; Zhi-Ming Jin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-08

8.  Comparative survival risks in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer: a 10-year cohort analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Lee; Chan Wook Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Circulating Hybrid Cells: A Novel Liquid Biomarker of Treatment Response in Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Brett S Walker; Thomas L Sutton; Luai Zarour; John G Hunter; Stephanie G Wood; V Liana Tsikitis; Daniel O Herzig; Charles D Lopez; Emerson Y Chen; Skye C Mayo; Melissa H Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.