Literature DB >> 16332477

Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings.

Paolo P Bianchi1, Chiara Ceriani, Matteo Rottoli, Guido Torzilli, Giovanni Pompili, Alberto Malesci, Monica Ferraroni, Marco Montorsi.   

Abstract

The development of new surgical techniques and use of neoadjuvant therapy have increased the need for accurate preoperative staging of rectal cancer. We compared the ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coils to locally stage rectal carcinoma before surgery. Forty-nine patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma were T and N staged by EUS and either body coil MRI or phased-array coil MRI. After radical surgery, the preoperative findings were compared with histologic findings on the surgical specimen. For T stage, accuracies were 70% for EUS, 43% for body coil MRI, and 71% for phased-array coil MRI. For N stage, accuracies were 63% for EUS, 64% for body coil MRI, and 76% for phased-array coil MRI. For T stage, EUS had the best sensitivity (80%) and the same specificity (67%) as phased-array coil MRI. For N stage, phased-array coil MRI had the best sensitivity (63%) and the same specificity (80%) as the other methods. EUS and phased-array coil MRI provided similar results for assessing T stage. No method provided satisfactory assessments of local N stage, although phased-array coil MRI was marginally better in assessing this important parameter. Although none of the results differed significantly, phased-array coil MRI seems to be the best single method for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332477     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  34 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal cancers and villous adenomas.

Authors:  Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.722

2.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Frédéric Bretagnol; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prospective comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Preliminary report.

Authors:  A Waizer; E Powsner; I Russo; S Hadar; S Cytron; R Lombrozo; Y Wolloch; E Antebi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  W Thaler; S Watzka; F Martin; G La Guardia; K Psenner; G Bonatti; G Fichtel; E Egarter-Vigl; G P Marzoli
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Long-term functional results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Frédéric Bretagnol; Hervé Troubat; Christophe Laurent; Frank Zerbib; Jean Saric; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2004-02

7.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound.

Authors:  U Hildebrandt; G Feifel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Improved accuracy of computed tomography in local staging of rectal cancer using water enema.

Authors:  L Lupo; G Angelelli; O Pannarale; D Altomare; L Macarini; V Memeo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Staging of rectal carcinoma using MR double surface coil, MR endorectal coil, and intrarectal ultrasound: correlation with histopathologic findings.

Authors:  F B Joosten; J B Jansen; H J Joosten; G Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Local radiological staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  V Goh; S Halligan; C I Bartram
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  10 in total

1.  Computerized Tomography Criteria as a Tool for Simplifying the Assessment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Oren Gal; Dan Feldman; Amir Mari; Fadi Abu Baker; Dan Hebron; Yael Kopelman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

2.  Stage and size using magnetic resonance imaging and endosonography in neoadjuvantly-treated rectal cancer.

Authors:  Torbjörn Swartling; Peter Kälebo; Kristoffer Derwinger; Bengt Gustavsson; Göran Kurlberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Assessment of T staging and mesorectal fascia status using high-resolution MRI in rectal cancer with rectal distention.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Rao; Meng-Su Zeng; Jian-Ming Xu; Xin-Yu Qin; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Ying-Yong Hou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in anorectal disease.

Authors:  Loren Berman; Gary M Israel; Shirley M McCarthy; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Walter E Longo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Evaluation of a rabbit rectal VX2 carcinoma model using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xin-Mei Liang; Guang-Yu Tang; Ying-Sheng Cheng; Bi Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ali A Siddiqui; Yomi Fayiga; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Combining CT Images and Clinical Features of Four Periods to Predict Whether Patients Have Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yingyin Feng; Qi Ding; Chen Meng; Wenfeng Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Huixiu Lian
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07

8.  Surgical treatment for locally advanced lower third rectal cancer after neoadjuvent chemoradiation with capecitabine: prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Abd Elwanis; Doaa W Maximous; Mohamed Ibrahim Elsayed; Nabiel N H Mikhail
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasonography has limitations in determining the T stage in early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pei Chuan Tsung; Jong Hyeok Park; You Sun Kim; Sun Young Kim; Won Wo Park; Hyun Tae Kim; Jin Nam Kim; Yun Kyung Kang; Jeong Seop Moon
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 10.  Endorectal Ultrasonography and Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Show Similar Diagnostic Accuracy in Local Staging of Rectal Cancer: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Gianluca Pagano; Francesca Paola Tropeano; Eduardo Spina; Rosa Maione; Alessia Chini; Francesco Maione; Giuseppe Galloro; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.