Literature DB >> 20540907

Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers.

Weijie Chen1, Maryellen L Giger, Gillian M Newstead, Ulrich Bick, Sanaz A Jansen, Hui Li, Li Lan.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a preclinical evaluation of the robustness of our computerized system for breast lesion characterization on two breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) databases that were acquired using scanners from two different manufacturers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two clinical breast MRI databases were acquired from a Siemens scanner and a GE scanner, which shared similar imaging protocols and retrospectively collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. In our computerized analysis system, after a breast lesion is identified by the radiologist, the computer performs automatic lesion segmentation and feature extraction and outputs an estimated probability of malignancy. We used a Bayesian neural network with automatic relevance determination for joint feature selection and classification. To evaluate the robustness of our classification system, we first used Database 1 for feature selection and classifier training, and Database 2 to test the trained classifier. Then, we exchanged the two datasets and repeated the process. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a performance figure of merit in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions.
RESULTS: We obtained an AUC of 0.85 (approximate 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.91) for (a) feature selection and classifier training using Database 1 and testing on Database 2; and an AUC of 0.90 (approximate 95% CI 0.84-0.96) for (b) feature selection and classifier training using Database 2 and testing on Database 1. We failed to observe statistical significance for the difference AUC of 0.05 between the two database conditions (P = .24; 95% confidence interval -0.03, 0.1).
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the robustness of our computerized classification system in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI images from two manufacturers. Our study showed the feasibility of developing a computerized classification system that is robust across different scanners. 2010 AUR. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20540907      PMCID: PMC2907891          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  41 in total

1.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Li Lan; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Bayesian methods for pharmacokinetic models in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Volker J Schmid; Brandon Whitcher; Anwar R Padhani; N Jane Taylor; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system.

Authors:  Lina Arbash Meinel; Alan H Stolpen; Kevin S Berbaum; Laurie L Fajardo; Joseph M Reinhardt
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.

Authors:  Brent J Woods; Bradley D Clymer; Tahsin Kurc; Johannes T Heverhagen; Robert Stevens; Adem Orsdemir; Orhan Bulan; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice.

Authors:  Christiane Kuhl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

Authors:  Teresa C Williams; Wendy B DeMartini; Savannah C Partridge; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Ulrich Bick; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of Kinetic Entropy of Breast Masses Initially Found on MRI using Whole-lesion Curve Distribution Data: Comparison with the Standard Kinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Akiko Shimauchi; Hiroyuki Abe; David V Schacht; Jian Yulei; Federico D Pineda; Sanaz A Jansen; Rajiv Ganesh; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A new quantitative image analysis method for improving breast cancer diagnosis using DCE-MRI examinations.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Breast MRI radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Alexandra Edwards; Christopher Doyle; John Papaioannou; Kirti Kulkarni; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-09-30

Review 5.  Using quantitative image analysis to classify axillary lymph nodes on breast MRI: a new application for the Z 0011 Era.

Authors:  David V Schacht; Karen Drukker; Iris Pak; Hiroyuki Abe; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Digital Analysis in Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo; Michael Ingrisch; Eva Maria Fallenberg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Radiomics methodology for breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Heather M Whitney; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-08-24

8.  Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Margarita Zuley; Marie Ganott; Jose M Net; Elizabeth J Sutton; Kathleen R Brandt; Gary J Whitman; Suzanne D Conzen; Li Lan; Yuan Ji; Yitan Zhu; Carl C Jaffe; Erich P Huang; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Elizabeth A Morris; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays.

Authors:  Hui Li; Yitan Zhu; Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Katherine A Hoadley; Cheng Fan; Suzanne D Conzen; Gary J Whitman; Elizabeth J Sutton; Jose M Net; Marie Ganott; Erich Huang; Elizabeth A Morris; Charles M Perou; Yuan Ji; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomics data.

Authors:  Wentian Guo; Hui Li; Yitan Zhu; Li Lan; Shengjie Yang; Karen Drukker; Elizabeth Morris; Elizabeth Burnside; Gary Whitman; Maryellen L Giger; Yuan Ji
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.