RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To conduct a preclinical evaluation of the robustness of our computerized system for breast lesion characterization on two breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) databases that were acquired using scanners from two different manufacturers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two clinical breast MRI databases were acquired from a Siemens scanner and a GE scanner, which shared similar imaging protocols and retrospectively collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. In our computerized analysis system, after a breast lesion is identified by the radiologist, the computer performs automatic lesion segmentation and feature extraction and outputs an estimated probability of malignancy. We used a Bayesian neural network with automatic relevance determination for joint feature selection and classification. To evaluate the robustness of our classification system, we first used Database 1 for feature selection and classifier training, and Database 2 to test the trained classifier. Then, we exchanged the two datasets and repeated the process. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a performance figure of merit in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: We obtained an AUC of 0.85 (approximate 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.91) for (a) feature selection and classifier training using Database 1 and testing on Database 2; and an AUC of 0.90 (approximate 95% CI 0.84-0.96) for (b) feature selection and classifier training using Database 2 and testing on Database 1. We failed to observe statistical significance for the difference AUC of 0.05 between the two database conditions (P = .24; 95% confidence interval -0.03, 0.1). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the robustness of our computerized classification system in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI images from two manufacturers. Our study showed the feasibility of developing a computerized classification system that is robust across different scanners. 2010 AUR. All rights reserved.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To conduct a preclinical evaluation of the robustness of our computerized system for breast lesion characterization on two breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) databases that were acquired using scanners from two different manufacturers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two clinical breast MRI databases were acquired from a Siemens scanner and a GE scanner, which shared similar imaging protocols and retrospectively collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. In our computerized analysis system, after a breast lesion is identified by the radiologist, the computer performs automatic lesion segmentation and feature extraction and outputs an estimated probability of malignancy. We used a Bayesian neural network with automatic relevance determination for joint feature selection and classification. To evaluate the robustness of our classification system, we first used Database 1 for feature selection and classifier training, and Database 2 to test the trained classifier. Then, we exchanged the two datasets and repeated the process. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as a performance figure of merit in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: We obtained an AUC of 0.85 (approximate 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.91) for (a) feature selection and classifier training using Database 1 and testing on Database 2; and an AUC of 0.90 (approximate 95% CI 0.84-0.96) for (b) feature selection and classifier training using Database 2 and testing on Database 1. We failed to observe statistical significance for the difference AUC of 0.05 between the two database conditions (P = .24; 95% confidence interval -0.03, 0.1). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the robustness of our computerized classification system in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI images from two manufacturers. Our study showed the feasibility of developing a computerized classification system that is robust across different scanners. 2010 AUR. All rights reserved.
Authors: Volker J Schmid; Brandon Whitcher; Anwar R Padhani; N Jane Taylor; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Lina Arbash Meinel; Alan H Stolpen; Kevin S Berbaum; Laurie L Fajardo; Joseph M Reinhardt Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Brent J Woods; Bradley D Clymer; Tahsin Kurc; Johannes T Heverhagen; Robert Stevens; Adem Orsdemir; Orhan Bulan; Michael V Knopp Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Teresa C Williams; Wendy B DeMartini; Savannah C Partridge; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karen Drukker; Alexandra Edwards; Christopher Doyle; John Papaioannou; Kirti Kulkarni; Maryellen L Giger Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Margarita Zuley; Marie Ganott; Jose M Net; Elizabeth J Sutton; Kathleen R Brandt; Gary J Whitman; Suzanne D Conzen; Li Lan; Yuan Ji; Yitan Zhu; Carl C Jaffe; Erich P Huang; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Elizabeth A Morris; Maryellen L Giger Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hui Li; Yitan Zhu; Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Katherine A Hoadley; Cheng Fan; Suzanne D Conzen; Gary J Whitman; Elizabeth J Sutton; Jose M Net; Marie Ganott; Erich Huang; Elizabeth A Morris; Charles M Perou; Yuan Ji; Maryellen L Giger Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Wentian Guo; Hui Li; Yitan Zhu; Li Lan; Shengjie Yang; Karen Drukker; Elizabeth Morris; Elizabeth Burnside; Gary Whitman; Maryellen L Giger; Yuan Ji Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2015-09-23