Literature DB >> 16733695

Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness.

Jinsung Wang1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

We previously reported that opposite arm adaptation to visuomotor rotations improved the initial direction of right arm movements in right-handers, whereas it only improved the final position accuracy of their left arm movements. We now investigate the pattern of interlimb transfer following adaptation to 30 degrees visuomotor rotations in left-handers to determine whether the direction of transfer depends on handedness. Our results indicate unambiguous transfer across the arms. In terms of final position accuracy, the direction of transfer is opposite to that observed in right-handers, such that transfer only occurred from the left to the right arm movements. Directional accuracy also showed the opposite pattern of transfer to that of right-handers: initial movement direction, calculated at peak tangential acceleration, transferred only from right to left arms. When movement direction was measured later in the movement, at peak tangential velocity, asymmetrical transfer also occurred, such that greater transfer occurred from right to left arms. However, a small, but significant influence of opposite arm adaptation also occurred for the left arm, which might reflect differences in the use of the nondominant arm between left- and right-handers. Overall, our results indicate that left-handers show a mirror-imaged pattern of interlimb transfer in visuomotor adaptation to that previously reported for right-handers. This pattern of transfer is consistent with the hypothesis that asymmetry in interlimb transfer is dependent on differential specialization of the dominant and nondominant hemisphere/limb systems for trajectory and positional control, respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16733695     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0543-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien; Richard B Ivry; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Bilateral transfer in tapping skill in the absence of peripheral information.

Authors:  J I Laszlo; R A Baguley; P J Bairstow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Studies of squeezing: handedness, responding hand, response force, and asymmetry of readiness potential.

Authors:  M Kutas; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  C J Winstein; P S Pohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  31 in total

1.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Handedness and index finger movements performed on a small touchscreen.

Authors:  Tomoko Aoki; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Asymmetric interference in left-handers during bimanual movements reflects switch in lateralized control characteristics.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Aging reduces asymmetries in interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Andrzej Przybyla; Kati Wuebbenhorst; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Asymmetric generalization between the arm and leg following prism-induced visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Douglas N Savin; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Inter-limb transfer of learned ankle movements.

Authors:  Tiffany Morris; Nicki Ann Newby; Michael Wininger; William Craelius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.