Literature DB >> 15024063

Palm mutants in DNA polymerases alpha and eta alter DNA replication fidelity and translesion activity.

Atsuko Niimi1, Siripan Limsirichaikul, Shonen Yoshida, Shigenori Iwai, Chikahide Masutani, Fumio Hanaoka, Eric T Kool, Yukihiro Nishiyama, Motoshi Suzuki.   

Abstract

We isolated active mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase alpha that were associated with a defect in error discrimination. Among them, L868F DNA polymerase alpha has a spontaneous error frequency of 3 in 100 nucleotides and 570-fold lower replication fidelity than wild-type (WT) polymerase alpha. In vivo, mutant DNA polymerases confer a mutator phenotype and are synergistic with msh2 or msh6, suggesting that DNA polymerase alpha-dependent replication errors are recognized and repaired by mismatch repair. In vitro, L868F DNA polymerase alpha catalyzes efficient bypass of a cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, extending the 3' T 26000-fold more efficiently than the WT. Phe34 is equivalent to residue Leu868 in translesion DNA polymerase eta, and the F34L mutant of S. cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta has reduced translesion DNA synthesis activity in vitro. These data suggest that high-fidelity DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase alpha is required for genomic stability in yeast. The data also suggest that the phenylalanine and leucine residues in translesion and replicative DNA polymerases, respectively, might have played a role in the functional evolution of these enzyme classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15024063      PMCID: PMC371111          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.7.2734-2746.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  62 in total

1.  The conserved active site motif A of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I is highly mutable.

Authors:  A Shinkai; P H Patel; L A Loeb
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-03-12       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Checkpoint-dependent activation of mutagenic repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae pol3-01 mutants.

Authors:  A Datta; J L Schmeits; N S Amin; P J Lau; K Myung; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Crystal structure of a DinB lesion bypass DNA polymerase catalytic fragment reveals a classic polymerase catalytic domain.

Authors:  B L Zhou; J D Pata; T A Steitz
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  S Waga; B Stillman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Base mispair extension kinetics. Comparison of DNA polymerase alpha and reverse transcriptase.

Authors:  L V Mendelman; J Petruska; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Biochemical basis of DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  M F Goodman; S Creighton; L B Bloom; J Petruska
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 8.250

7.  In vivo consequences of putative active site mutations in yeast DNA polymerases alpha, epsilon, delta, and zeta.

Authors:  Y I Pavlov; P V Shcherbakova; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Specific amino acid changes enhance the anti-recombination activity of the UmuD'C complex.

Authors:  S Sommer; G Coste; A Bailone
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Enhancement of MSH2-MSH3-mediated mismatch recognition by the yeast MLH1-PMS1 complex.

Authors:  Y Habraken; P Sung; L Prakash; S Prakash
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Replication of a cis-syn thymine dimer at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Hong Ling; François Boudsocq; Brian S Plosky; Roger Woodgate; Wei Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  57 in total

1.  Conformational dependence of 13C shielding and coupling constants for methionine methyl groups.

Authors:  Glenn L Butterfoss; Eugene F DeRose; Scott A Gabel; Lalith Perera; Joseph M Krahn; Geoffrey A Mueller; Xunhai Zheng; Robert E London
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Differential correction of lagging-strand replication errors made by DNA polymerases {alpha} and {delta}.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Grace E Kissling; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence for extrinsic exonucleolytic proofreading.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Youri I Pavlov; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Mutator alleles of yeast DNA polymerase zeta.

Authors:  Ayako N Sakamoto; Jana E Stone; Grace E Kissling; Scott D McCulloch; Youri I Pavlov; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-08-21

6.  Activity and fidelity of human DNA polymerase α depend on primer structure.

Authors:  Andrey G Baranovskiy; Vincent N Duong; Nigar D Babayeva; Yinbo Zhang; Youri I Pavlov; Karen S Anderson; Tahir H Tahirov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  INCURVATA2 encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA Polymerase alpha and interacts with genes involved in chromatin-mediated cellular memory in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  José María Barrero; Rebeca González-Bayón; Juan Carlos del Pozo; María Rosa Ponce; José Luis Micol
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Biochemical analysis of active site mutations of human polymerase η.

Authors:  Samuel C Suarez; Renee A Beardslee; Shannon M Toffton; Scott D McCulloch
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  A cancer-associated DNA polymerase delta variant modeled in yeast causes a catastrophic increase in genomic instability.

Authors:  Danielle L Daee; Tony M Mertz; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Exonuclease 1 preferentially repairs mismatches generated by DNA polymerase α.

Authors:  Sascha E Liberti; Andres A Larrea; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.