Literature DB >> 15331483

Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Alexandra Barratt1, Lyndal Trevena, Heather M Davey, Kirsten McCaffery.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15331483      PMCID： PMC515211          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  25 in total

1.  Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives, and ultrasonographers.

Authors:  S Oliver; L Rajan; H Turner; A Oakley; V Entwistle; I Watt; T A Sheldon; J Rosser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

Review 2.  Labelling of hypertensives: a review of the data.

Authors:  M H Alderman; B Lamport
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Cholesterol screening programmes: how much potential benefit?

Authors:  K T Khaw; G Rose
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-02

4.  Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy.

Authors:  W C Black; H G Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  A M Kavanagh; D H Broom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-10

Review 6.  Labeling of participants in high blood pressure screening programs. Implications for blood cholesterol screenings.

Authors:  R C Lefebvre; K G Hursey; R A Carleton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-09

7.  Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented.

Authors:  A E Raffle; B Alden; M Quinn; P J Babb; M T Brett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

8.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Bjørn Heine Strand; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-10

9.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; D Stacey; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; D Rovner; M Holmes-Rovner; V Tait; J Tetroe; V Fiset; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  29 in total

1.  How did the PSA system arise?

Authors:  Stewart Justman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Kirsten McCaffery; Glenn Salkeld; Patrick Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-13

3.  Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Levi Ross; Alicestine D Ashford; Sherese J Bleechington; Tyra Dark; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid.

Authors:  Krystal A Klein; Lindsey Watson; Joan S Ash; Karen B Eden
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-02-26

5.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

6.  Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten Howard; Les Irwig; Glenn Salkeld; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-08

7.  Improving calculation, interpretation and communication of familial colorectal cancer risk: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicky Dekker; Rosella P M G Hermens; Glyn Elwyn; Trudy van der Weijden; Fokko M Nagengast; Peter van Duijvendijk; Simone Salemink; Eddy Adang; J Han J M van Krieken; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Siranda Torvaldsen; Lyndal Trevena; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Don Nutbeam; Alexandra Barratt; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.377
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.