Literature DB >> 12096083

Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Ruth Etzioni1, David F Penson, Julie M Legler, Dante di Tommaso, Rob Boer, Peter H Gann, Eric J Feuer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer is considered a major potential drawback of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Quantitative estimates of the magnitude of this problem are, however, lacking. We estimated rates of prostate cancer overdiagnosis due to PSA testing that are consistent with the observed incidence of prostate cancer in the United States from 1988 through 1998. Overdiagnosis was defined as the detection of prostate cancer through PSA testing that otherwise would not have been diagnosed within the patient's lifetime.
METHODS: We developed a computer simulation model of PSA testing and subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis and death from prostate cancer among a hypothetical cohort of two million men who were 60-84 years old in 1988. Given values for the expected lead time--that is, the time by which the test advanced diagnosis--and the expected incidence of prostate cancer in the absence of PSA testing, the model projected the increase in population incidence of prostate cancer associated with PSA testing. By comparing the model-projected incidence with the observed incidence derived from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data, we determined the lead times and corresponding overdiagnosis rates that were consistent with the observed data.
RESULTS: SEER data on prostate cancer incidence from 1988 through 1998 were consistent with overdiagnosis rates of approximately 29% for whites and 44% for blacks among men with prostate cancers detected by PSA screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Among men with prostate cancer that would be detected only at autopsy, these rates correspond to overdiagnosis rates of, at most, 15% in whites and 37% in blacks. The observed trends in prostate cancer incidence are consistent with considerable overdiagnosis among PSA-detected cases. However, the results suggest that the majority of screen-detected cancers diagnosed between 1988 and 1998 would have presented clinically and that only a minority of cases found at autopsy would have been detected by PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12096083     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.13.981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  252 in total

1.  Optimization of PSA screening policies: a comparison of the patient and societal perspectives.

Authors:  Jingyu Zhang; Brian T Denton; Hari Balasubramanian; Nilay D Shah; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin; Changhong Yu; Kristen L Zakian; Kazuma Udo; Peter T Scardino; James Eastham; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts.

Authors:  Bernard Junod; Per-Henrik Zahl; Robert M Kaplan; Jørn Olsen; Sander Greenland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: The tar pit of the protein biomarker pipeline.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pei Wang
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Priorities in future research in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Lyndal Trevena; Heather M Davey; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

7.  Race/ethnicity and the receipt of watchful waiting for the initial management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown; Arnold L Potosky; Carrie N Klabunde; W W Davis; Judd W Moul; Angela Fahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Lifestyle and dietary factors in the prevention of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn M Wilson; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Prostate cancer incidence as an iceberg.

Authors:  Lorelei A Mucci; Claire H Pernar; Sam Peisch; Travis Gerke; Kathryn M Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.