Literature DB >> 23420062

Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Meteb Al-Foheidi1, Mubarak M Al-Mansour, Ezzeldin M Ibrahim.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. The disease remains a public health concern as recent evidence indicates that the breast cancer burden has increased mainly in developing and low-income countries (DLICs). Despite the demonstrated benefits, the debate about the real benefits and harms of breast cancer screening is ongoing. Many experts believe that the benefits of screening, in terms of reduced breast cancer mortality, outweigh the harms, whereas others think the opposite. In this review, we assess the clinical utility of available screening modalities, present evidence, overdiagnosis, cost-effectiveness, and other pertinent issues. We also examine relevant data from DLICs to underscore the barriers and challenges that impede implementation of screening strategies in those populations. We also provide recommendations concerning rational preventive strategies for breast cancer control for women in DLICs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23420062     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0471-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  114 in total

1.  Breast screening in the emerging world: high prevalence of breast cancer in Cairo.

Authors:  S Boulos; M Gadallah; S Neguib; Ea Essam; A Youssef; A Costa; I Mittra; A B Miller
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Fifty years of cancer incidence: CI5 I-IX.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Jacques Ferlay; Maria-Paula Curado; Freddie Bray; Brenda Edwards; Hai-Rim Shin; David Forman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Update of the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: histologic grade-specific and age-specific results.

Authors:  L Tabar; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost; S W Duffy
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  1999

4.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.

Authors:  Barbro Numan Hellquist; Stephen W Duffy; Shahin Abdsaleh; Lena Björneld; Pál Bordás; László Tabár; Bedrich Viták; Sophia Zackrisson; Lennarth Nyström; Håkan Jonsson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Emily White; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Berta M Geller; Robert D Rosenberg; Karla Kerlikowske; Laura Saba; Pamela M Vacek; Patricia A Carney; Diana S M Buist; Nina Oestreicher; William Barlow; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Ying Yang; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Mark F Munsell; Anthony B Miller; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Cheng-Har Yip; Robert A Smith; Roman Shyyan; Stephen F Sener; Alexandru Eniu; Robert W Carlson; Edward Azavedo; Joe Harford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Bjørn Heine Strand; Jan Maehlen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-10

10.  Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Preventing breast cancer in LMICs via screening and/or early detection: The real and the surreal.

Authors:  Subhojit Dey
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

2.  An mHealth model to increase clinic attendance for breast symptoms in rural Bangladesh: can bridging the digital divide help close the cancer divide?

Authors:  Ophira M Ginsburg; Mridul Chowdhury; Wei Wu; Md Touhidul Imran Chowdhury; Bidhan Chandra Pal; Rifat Hasan; Zahid H Khan; Dali Dutta; Arif Abu Saeem; Raiyan Al-Mansur; Sahin Mahmud; James H Woods; Heather H Story; Reza Salim
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-01-06

3.  Epidemiology of Breast Cancer among Bahraini Women: Data from the Bahrain Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Randah R Hamadeh; Najat M Abulfatih; Majeda A Fekri; Hala E Al-Mehza
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-04-07

Review 4.  New targeted therapies for breast cancer: A focus on tumor microenvironmental signals and chemoresistant breast cancers.

Authors:  Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje; Paul Faustin Seke Etet; Lorella Vecchio; Richard Simo Tagne; Jeremie Mbo Amvene; Jean-Marc Muller; Mauro Krampera; Kiven Erique Lukong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Improving women's health in low-income and middle-income countries. Part II: the needs of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Giuliano Mariani; Joanna Kasznia-Brown; Diana Paez; Miriam N Mikhail; Dina H Salama; Neerja Bhatla; Paola A Erba; Ravi Kashyap
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 6.  Developing the Evidence Base to Inform Best Practice: A Scoping Study of Breast and Cervical Cancer Reviews in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Margaret M Demment; Karen Peters; J Andrew Dykens; Ann Dozier; Haq Nawaz; Scott McIntosh; Jennifer S Smith; Angela Sy; Tracy Irwin; Thomas T Fogg; Mahmooda Khaliq; Rachel Blumenfeld; Mehran Massoudi; Timothy De Ver Dye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Women's responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Shirley Morrison Bluethmann; Margaret Sheets; Kelly Morrison Opdyke; Kathryn Gates-Ferris; Marc Hurlbert; Elizabeth Harden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Overdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Quality assurance target for community-based breast cancer screening in China: a model simulation.

Authors:  Lan Yang; Jing Wang; Juan Cheng; Yuan Wang; Wenli Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Optical imaging for breast cancer prescreening.

Authors:  Anuradha Godavarty; Suset Rodriguez; Young-Jin Jung; Stephanie Gonzalez
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.