Literature DB >> 15008412

Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.

Stanley A Sawyer1, Rob J Kulathinal, Carlos D Bustamante, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

One of the principal goals of population genetics is to understand the processes by which genetic variation within species (polymorphism) becomes converted into genetic differences between species (divergence). In this transformation, selective neutrality, near neutrality, and positive selection may each play a role, differing from one gene to the next. Synonymous nucleotide sites are often used as a uniform standard of comparison across genes on the grounds that synonymous sites are subject to relatively weak selective constraints and so may, to a first approximation, be regarded as neutral. Synonymous sites are also interdigitated with nonsynonymous sites and so are affected equally by genomic context and demographic factors. Hence a comparison of levels of polymorphism and divergence between synonymous sites and amino acid replacement sites in a gene is potentially informative about the magnitude of selective forces associated with amino acid replacements. We have analyzed 56 genes in which polymorphism data from D. simulans are compared with divergence from a reference strain of D. melanogaster. The framework of the analysis is Bayesian and assumes that the distribution of selective effects (Malthusian fitnesses) is Gaussian with a mean that differs for each gene. In such a model, the average scaled selection intensity (gamma = N(e)s) of amino acid replacements eligible to become polymorphic or fixed is -7.31, and the standard deviation of selective effects within each locus is 6.79 (assuming homoscedasticity across loci). For newly arising mutations of this type that occur in autosomal or X-linked genes, the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 19.7%. Among the amino acid polymorphisms in the sample, the expected average proportion of beneficial mutations is 47.7%, and among amino acid replacements that become fixed the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 94.3%. The average scaled selection intensity of fixed mutations is +5.1. The presence of positive selection is pervasive with the single exception of kl-5, a Y-linked fertility gene. We find no evidence that a significant fraction of fixed amino acid replacements is neutral or nearly neutral or that positive selection drives amino acid replacements at only a subset of the loci. These results are model dependent and we discuss possible modifications of the model that might allow more neutral and nearly neutral amino acid replacements to be fixed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15008412     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-003-0022-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  31 in total

1.  The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Stanley A Sawyer; Kenneth M Olsen; Michael D Purugganan; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A maximum likelihood method for analyzing pseudogene evolution: implications for silent site evolution in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene.

Authors:  R Nielsen; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  73 in total

1.  Impact of genetic architecture on the relative rates of X versus autosomal adaptive substitution.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Nadia D Singh; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.

Authors:  Daniel P Rice; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effects of demography and linkage on the estimation of selection and mutation parameters.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The structured ancestral selection graph and the many-demes limit.

Authors:  Paul F Slade; John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth; Carolina Bartolomé; Véronique Nöel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A composite-likelihood approach for detecting directional selection from DNA sequence data.

Authors:  Lan Zhu; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The rank ordering of genotypic fitness values predicts genetic constraint on natural selection on landscapes lacking sign epistasis.

Authors:  Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John J Welch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.