Literature DB >> 22298701

A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.

Daniel P Rice1, Jeffrey P Townsend.   

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists attribute much of the phenotypic diversity observed in nature to the action of natural selection. However, for many phenotypic traits, especially quantitative phenotypic traits, it has been challenging to test for the historical action of selection. An important challenge for biologists studying quantitative traits, therefore, is to distinguish between traits that have evolved under the influence of strong selection and those that have evolved neutrally. Most existing tests for selection employ molecular data, but selection also leaves a mark on the genetic architecture underlying a trait. In particular, the distribution of quantitative trait locus (QTL) effect sizes and the distribution of mutational effects together provide information regarding the history of selection. Despite the increasing availability of QTL and mutation accumulation data, such data have not yet been effectively exploited for this purpose. We present a model of the evolution of QTL and employ it to formulate a test for historical selection. To provide a baseline for neutral evolution of the trait, we estimate the distribution of mutational effects from mutation accumulation experiments. We then apply a maximum-likelihood-based method of inference to estimate the range of selection strengths under which such a distribution of mutations could generate the observed QTL. Our test thus represents the first integration of population genetic theory and QTL data to measure the historical influence of selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298701      PMCID: PMC3316662          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.137075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  60 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci for the monoamine-related traits heart rate and headless behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Ashton; A P Wagoner; R Carrillo; G Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head.

Authors:  R C Albertson; J T Streelman; T D Kocher
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Quantitative trait locus analyses and the study of evolutionary process.

Authors:  David L Erickson; Charles B Fenster; Hans K Stenøien; Donald Price
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  The fixation probability of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Z Patwa; L M Wahl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Nautural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Linkage disequilibrium and recent selection at three immunity receptor loci in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Todd A Schlenke; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetics of species differences in the wild annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris.

Authors:  Christian Lexer; David M Rosenthal; Olivier Raymond; Lisa A Donovan; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and evolutionary processes generating variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Pétra Vande Zande; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Multiple-Line Inference of Selection on Quantitative Traits.

Authors:  Nico Riedel; Bhavin S Khatri; Michael Lässig; Johannes Berg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An integrative genomic analysis of the Longshanks selection experiment for longer limbs in mice.

Authors:  João Pl Castro; Michelle N Yancoskie; Campbell Rolian; Yingguang Frank Chan; Marta Marchini; Stefanie Belohlavy; Layla Hiramatsu; Marek Kučka; William H Beluch; Ronald Naumann; Isabella Skuplik; John Cobb; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Distributions of Mutational Effects and the Estimation of Directional Selection in Divergent Lineages of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Briton Park; Matthew T Rutter; Charles B Fenster; V Vaughan Symonds; Mark C Ungerer; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Pleiotropic mutations are subject to strong stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Julie M Collet; Scott L Allen; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Population perspectives on functional genomic variation in yeast.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Paul M Magwene
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Contrasting Frequencies and Effects of cis- and trans-Regulatory Mutations Affecting Gene Expression.

Authors:  Brian P H Metzger; Fabien Duveau; David C Yuan; Stephen Tryban; Bing Yang; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA.

Authors:  Eeshit Dhaval Vaishnav; Carl G de Boer; Jennifer Molinet; Moran Yassour; Lin Fan; Xian Adiconis; Dawn A Thompson; Joshua Z Levin; Francisco A Cubillos; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  Resampling QTL effects in the QTL sign test leads to incongruous sensitivity to variance in effect size.

Authors:  Daniel P Rice; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Selection on noise constrains variation in a eukaryotic promoter.

Authors:  Brian P H Metzger; David C Yuan; Jonathan D Gruber; Fabien Duveau; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.