Literature DB >> 16421730

The Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when returned to the subject via muscle tendon vibration.

Frederic Albert1, Mikael Bergenheim, Edith Ribot-Ciscar, Jean-Pierre Roll.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to further investigate the contribution of primary muscle spindle feedback to proprioception and higher brain functions, such as movement trajectory recognition. For this purpose, complex illusory movements were evoked in subjects by applying patterns of muscle tendon vibration mimicking the natural Ia afferent pattern. Ia afferent messages were previously recorded using microneurographic method from the six main muscle groups acting on the ankle joint during imposed "writing like" movements. The mean Ia afferent pattern was calculated for each muscle group and used as a template to pilot each vibrator. Eleven different vibratory patterns were applied to ten volunteers. Subjects were asked both to copy the perceived illusory movements by hand on a digitizing tablet and to recognize and name the corresponding graphic symbol. The results show that the Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when it is applied to the subject via the appropriate pattern of muscle tendon vibration. The geometry and the kinematic parameters of the imposed and illusory movements are very similar and the so-called "two-thirds power law" is present in the reproduction of the vibration-induced illusory movements. Vibrations within the "natural" frequency range of Ia fibres firing (around 30 Hz) produce clear illusions of movements in all the tested subjects. In addition, increasing the mean frequency of the vibration patterns resulted in a linear increase in the size of the illusory movements. Lastly, the subjects were able to recognize and name the symbols evoked by the vibration-induced primary muscle spindle afferent patterns in 83% of the trials. These findings suggest that the "proprioceptive signature" of a given movement is associated with the corresponding "perceptual signature". The neural mechanisms possibly underlying the sensory to perceptual transformation are discussed in the general framework of "the neuronal population vector model".

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421730     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0325-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The preferred sensory direction of muscle spindle primary endings influences the velocity coding of two-dimensional limb movements in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing.

Authors:  Frederic Albert; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Michel Fiocchi; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  S E Grill; M Hallett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories.

Authors:  C Ghez; J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C N Christakos; S E Cooper
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

6.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Trajectory determines movement dynamics.

Authors:  P Viviani; C Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity.

Authors:  A B Schwartz; D W Moran
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand.

Authors:  G Macefield; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  11 in total

1.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Pierre Roll; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  'Doublecheck: a sensory confirmation is required to own a robotic hand, sending a command to feel in charge of it'.

Authors:  M Pinardi; F Ferrari; M D'Alonzo; F Clemente; L Raiano; C Cipriani; G Di Pino
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.550

4.  Regaining motor control in musician's dystonia by restoring sensorimotor organization.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; Katherine Butler; Aaron Williamon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A new vibrator to stimulate muscle proprioceptors in fMRI.

Authors:  Marie Montant; Patricia Romaiguère; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Proprioceptive Augmentation With Illusory Kinaesthetic Sensation in Stroke Patients Improves Movement Quality in an Active Upper Limb Reach-and-Point Task.

Authors:  Francesca Ferrari; Courtney E Shell; Zachary C Thumser; Francesco Clemente; Ela B Plow; Christian Cipriani; Paul D Marasco
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Functional changes in muscle afferent neurones in an osteoarthritis model: implications for impaired proprioceptive performance.

Authors:  Qi Wu; James L Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is the Frequency in Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation the Key Parameter in Modulating the Corticospinal Excitability of Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients with Spasticity?

Authors:  Marco Antonio Cavalcanti Garcia; João Marcos Yamasaki Catunda; Marcio Nogueira de Souza; Ana Paula Fontana; Sandro Sperandei; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Emanuele Formento; Karen Minassian; Fabien Wagner; Jean Baptiste Mignardot; Camille G Le Goff-Mignardot; Andreas Rowald; Jocelyne Bloch; Silvestro Micera; Marco Capogrosso; Gregoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The preload force affects the perception threshold of muscle vibration-induced movement illusions.

Authors:  Francesca Ferrari; Francesco Clemente; Christian Cipriani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.