Literature DB >> 15006751

Heat shock response in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Maria De Angelis1, Raffaella Di Cagno, Claude Huet, Carmine Crecchio, Patrick F Fox, Marco Gobbetti.   

Abstract

Heat stress resistance and response were studied in strains of Lactobacillus plantarum. Stationary-phase cells of L. plantarum DPC2739 had decimal reduction times (D values) (D value was the time that it took to reduce the number of cells by 1 log cycle) in sterile milk of 32.9, 14.7, and 7.14 s at 60, 72, and 75 degrees C, respectively. When mid-exponential-phase cells were used, the D values decreased. The temperature increases which caused a 10-fold reduction in the D value ranged from 9 to 20 degrees C, depending on the strain. Part of the cell population treated at 72 degrees C for 90 s recovered viability during incubation at 7 degrees C in sterile milk for 20 days. When mid-exponential- or stationary-phase cells of L. plantarum DPC2739 were adapted to 42 degrees C for 1 h, the heat resistance at 72 degrees C for 90 s increased ca. 3 and 2 log cycles, respectively. Heat-adapted cells also showed increased growth at pH 5 and in the presence of 6% NaCl. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of proteins expressed by control and heat-adapted cells revealed changes in the levels of expression of 31 and 18 proteins in mid-exponential- and stationary-phase cells, respectively. Twelve proteins were commonly induced. Nine proteins induced in the heat-adapted mid-exponential- and/or stationary-phase cells of L. plantarum DPC2739 were subjected to N-terminal sequencing. These proteins were identified as DnaK, GroEL, trigger factor, ribosomal proteins L1, L11, L31, and S6, DNA-binding protein II HlbA, and CspC. All of these proteins have been found to play a role in the mechanisms of stress adaptation in other bacteria. Antibodies against GroES detected a protein which was induced moderately, while antibodies against DnaJ and GrpE reacted with proteins whose level of expression did not vary after heat adaptation. This study showed that the heat resistance of L. plantarum is a complex process involving proteins with various roles in cell physiology, including chaperone activity, ribosome stability, stringent response mediation, temperature sensing, and control of ribosomal function. The physiological mechanisms of response to pasteurization in L. plantarum are fundamental for survival in cheese during manufacture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15006751      PMCID: PMC368309          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1336-1346.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  45 in total

Review 1.  Immunoaffinity identification of 2-DE separated proteins.

Authors:  B Magi; L Bini; B Marzocchi; S Liberatori; R Raggiaschi; V Pallini
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1999

2.  Modelling the effect of sublethal injury on the distribution of the lag times of individual cells of Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Jan P P M Smelt; Gertjan D Otten; Ad P Bos
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Modeling of the bacterial growth curve.

Authors:  M H Zwietering; I Jongenburger; F M Rombouts; K van 't Riet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cloning and characterization of cspL and cspP, two cold-inducible genes from Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  B Mayo; S Derzelle; M Fernández; C Léonard; T Ferain; P Hols; J E Suárez; J Delcour
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The focusing positions of polypeptides in immobilized pH gradients can be predicted from their amino acid sequences.

Authors:  B Bjellqvist; G J Hughes; C Pasquali; N Paquet; F Ravier; J C Sanchez; S Frutiger; D Hochstrasser
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  Lactococcus lactis, a bacterial model for stress responses and survival.

Authors:  P Duwat; B Cesselin; S Sourice; A Gruss
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Magnesium ions mediate contacts between phosphoryl oxygens at positions 2122 and 2176 of the 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L1.

Authors:  D Drygin; R A Zimmermann
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Methods for increasing the resolution of two-dimensional protein electrophoresis.

Authors:  D F Hochstrasser; M G Harrington; A C Hochstrasser; M J Miller; C R Merril
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 9.  Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Maarten van de Guchte; Pascale Serror; Christian Chervaux; Tamara Smokvina; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Emmanuelle Maguin
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

10.  Two-dimensional electrophoresis study of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus thermotolerance.

Authors:  Gwenola Gouesbet; Gwenael Jan; Patrick Boyaval
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  25 in total

1.  Metaproteomics analysis reveals the adaptation process for the chicken gut microbiota.

Authors:  Yue Tang; Anthony Underwood; Adriana Gielbert; Martin J Woodward; Liljana Petrovska
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  How do bifidobacteria counteract environmental challenges? Mechanisms involved and physiological consequences.

Authors:  Lorena Ruiz; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Miguel Gueimonde; Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán; Abelardo Margolles; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.523

3.  Short- and long-term adaptation to ethanol stress and its cross-protective consequences in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Hermien van Bokhorst-van de Veen; Tjakko Abee; Marcel Tempelaars; Peter A Bron; Michiel Kleerebezem; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Response of Lactobacillus helveticus PR4 to heat stress during propagation in cheese whey with a gradient of decreasing temperatures.

Authors:  Raffaella Di Cagno; Maria De Angelis; Antonio Limitone; Patrick F Fox; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Modification of the technical properties of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533 by supplementing the growth medium with unsaturated fatty acids.

Authors:  J A Muller; R P Ross; W F H Sybesma; G F Fitzgerald; C Stanton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Influence of the Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM
and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 on Proteolysis Patterns
of Edam Cheese.

Authors:  Marek Aljewicz; Grażyna Cichosz; Beata Nalepa; Marika Kowalska
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Characterization of Lactobacillus brevis L62 strain, highly tolerant to copper ions.

Authors:  Jasna Mrvčić; Ana Butorac; Ema Solić; Damir Stanzer; Višnja Bačun-Družina; Mario Cindrić; Vesna Stehlik-Tomas
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Quantifying Variability in Growth and Thermal Inactivation Kinetics of Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  D C Aryani; H M W den Besten; M H Zwietering
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Proteomics analysis of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a new probiotic bacterium isolated from traditional home-made koumiss in Inner Mongolia of China.

Authors:  Rina Wu; Weiwei Wang; Dongliang Yu; Wenyi Zhang; Yan Li; Zhihong Sun; Junrui Wu; He Meng; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Indigenous and environmental modulation of frequencies of mutation in Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  Ronnie Machielsen; Ingrid J van Alen-Boerrigter; Lucy A Koole; Roger S Bongers; Michiel Kleerebezem; Johan E T Van Hylckama Vlieg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.