Literature DB >> 21484166

How do bifidobacteria counteract environmental challenges? Mechanisms involved and physiological consequences.

Lorena Ruiz1, Patricia Ruas-Madiedo, Miguel Gueimonde, Clara G de Los Reyes-Gavilán, Abelardo Margolles, Borja Sánchez.   

Abstract

An effective response to stress is of paramount importance for probiotic bifidobacteria administered in foods, since it determines their performance as beneficial microorganisms. Firstly, bifidobacteria have to be resistant to the stress sources typical in manufacturing, including heating, exposure to low water activities, osmotic shock and presence of oxygen. Secondly, and once they are orally ingested, bifidobacteria have to overcome physiological barriers in order to arrive in the large intestine biologically active. These barriers are mainly the acid pH in the stomach and the presence of high bile salt concentrations in the small intestine. In addition, the large intestine is, in terms of microbial amounts, a densely populated environment in which there is an extreme variability in carbon source availability. For this reason, bifidobacteria harbours a wide molecular machinery allowing the degradation of a wide variety of otherwise non-digestible sugars. In this review, the molecular mechanisms allowing this bacterial group to favourably react to the presence of different stress sources are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21484166      PMCID: PMC3145062          DOI: 10.1007/s12263-010-0207-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Nutr        ISSN: 1555-8932            Impact factor:   5.523


  81 in total

1.  The clpB gene of Bifidobacterium breve UCC 2003: transcriptional analysis and first insights into stress induction.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; John G Kenny; Ziding Zhang; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  The ClgR protein regulates transcription of the clpP operon in Bifidobacterium breve UCC 2003.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; Ziding Zhang; Michelle Cronin; Carlos Canchaya; John G Kenny; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genome analysis of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 reveals metabolic pathways for host-derived glycan foraging.

Authors:  Francesca Turroni; Francesca Bottacini; Elena Foroni; Imke Mulder; Jae-Han Kim; Aldert Zomer; Borja Sánchez; Alessandro Bidossi; Alberto Ferrarini; Vanessa Giubellini; Massimo Delledonne; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro Coutinho; Marco Oggioni; Gerald F Fitzgerald; David Mills; Abelardo Margolles; Denise Kelly; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Mark A Schell; Maria Karmirantzou; Berend Snel; David Vilanova; Bernard Berger; Gabriella Pessi; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Frank Desiere; Peer Bork; Michele Delley; R David Pridmore; Fabrizio Arigoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Basic features of the stress response in three species of bifidobacteria: B. longum, B. adolescentis, and B. breve.

Authors:  G Schmidt; R Zink
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Adaptation and response of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis to bile: a proteomic and physiological approach.

Authors:  Borja Sánchez; Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès; Birgitte Stuer-Lauridsen; Patricia Ruas-Madiedo; Patricia Anglade; Fabienne Baraige; Clara G de los Reyes-Gavilán; Eric Johansen; Monique Zagorec; Abelardo Margolles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Maarten van de Guchte; Pascale Serror; Christian Chervaux; Tamara Smokvina; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Emmanuelle Maguin
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Characterization of the groEL and groES loci in Bifidobacterium breve UCC 2003: genetic, transcriptional, and phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; Carlos Canchaya; Ralf Zink; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Employment of stressful conditions during culture production to enhance subsequent cold- and acid-tolerance of bifidobacteria.

Authors:  J E Maus; S C Ingham
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Classification of a moderately oxygen-tolerant isolate from baby faeces as Bifidobacterium thermophilum.

Authors:  Ueli von Ah; Valeria Mozzetti; Christophe Lacroix; Ehab E Kheadr; Ismaïl Fliss; Leo Meile
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  20 in total

1.  Mutual Cross-Feeding Interactions between Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum NCC2705 and Eubacterium rectale ATCC 33656 Explain the Bifidogenic and Butyrogenic Effects of Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharides.

Authors:  Audrey Rivière; Mérilie Gagnon; Stefan Weckx; Denis Roy; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Overexpression of Small Heat Shock Protein Enhances Heat- and Salt-Stress Tolerance of Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705.

Authors:  Gul Bahar Khaskheli; FangLei Zuo; Rui Yu; ShangWu Chen
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Genetic and physiological responses of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis to hydrogen peroxide stress.

Authors:  Taylor S Oberg; Robert E Ward; James L Steele; Jeff R Broadbent
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Cocktails of probiotics pre-adapted to multiple stress factors are more robust under simulated gastrointestinal conditions than their parental counterparts and exhibit enhanced antagonistic capabilities against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Moloko Gloria Mathipa; Mapitsi Silvester Thantsha
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.181

5.  Inclusion of Oat in Feeding Can Increase the Potential Probiotic Bifidobacteria in Sow Milk.

Authors:  Rabin Gyawali; Radiah C Minor; Barry Donovan; Salam A Ibrahim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Enhancing probiotic stability in industrial processes.

Authors:  Miguel Gueimonde; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2012-06-18

7.  Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.

Authors:  Lorena Ruiz; Abelardo Margolles; Borja Sánchez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Impact on human health of microorganisms present in fermented dairy products: an overview.

Authors:  María Fernández; John Andrew Hudson; Riitta Korpela; Clara G de los Reyes-Gavilán
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Administration Matrix Modifies the Beneficial Properties of a Probiotic Mix of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5.

Authors:  Gréta Pápai; Edgar Torres-Maravilla; Florian Chain; Éva Varga-Visi; Otília Antal; Zoltán Naár; Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán; Philippe Langella; Rebeca Martín
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Antagonistic Characteristics Against Food-borne Pathogenic Bacteria of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria Isolated from Feces of Healthy Thai Infants.

Authors:  Supansa Uraipan; Tipparat Hongpattarakere
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 0.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.