Literature DB >> 1499441

Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter.

H E Mattox1, J E Richter, J W Sinclair, J E Price, L D Case.   

Abstract

Limiting the widespread use of 24-hr pH monitoring is the necessity of manometrically placing the pH probe 5 cm above the proximal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) border. Therefore, we prospectively compared LES localization by gastroesophageal pH step-up with manometry in 71 patients and 14 asymptomatic volunteers. The gastroesophageal pH step-up significantly correlated with the proximal LES border in patients (r = 0.53, P less than 0.0001) and volunteers (r = 0.91, P less than 0.0001). Based on previously published criteria, the pH step-up value was considered acceptably accurate if it was within +/- 3 cm (6 cm total span) of the manometrically determined proximal LES border. In 58% of patients and 29% of volunteers the pH step-up occurred outside this accuracy range. Esophagitis (P = 0.015) and abnormal reflux parameters (P = 0.002) were variables contributing to this error. Subsequent analysis found that the pH step-up overestimated the proximal LES border and occurred at the midportion of the sphincter. The pH step-up still inaccurately located the mid LES in 34% of patients. Therefore, manometry should remain the standard for accurate LES localization prior to placing the pH probe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1499441     DOI: 10.1007/bf01296558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  12 in total

1.  A simplified technique for accurate placement of ambulatory pH probes.

Authors:  K R DeVault; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; T R DeMeester; W Schwizer; K E Johansson; S C Cheng
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Simultaneous pH recordings from multiple esophageal sites in children with and without distal gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J M Sondheimer; G M Haase
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application.

Authors:  B W Ward; W C Wu; J E Richter; K W Lui; D O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The distal esophageal sphincter and its relationship to gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  R L Thurer; T R Demeester; L F Johnson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J Spencer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Extended four-channel esophageal pH monitoring: the importance of acid reflux patterns at the middle and proximal levels.

Authors:  G M Haase; M N Ross; B Gance-Cleveland; K E Kolack
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 10.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Accurate positioning of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter: agreement between manometry and pH step-up method in two patient positions.

Authors:  Mehmet-Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Sadettin Cetiner; Mustafa Gulsen; Taner Yigit; Erkan Ozturk; Semih Gorgulu; Turgut Tufan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Oesophageal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J Borovicka; P Michetti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Lower oesophageal sphincter identification for gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: The step-up method revisited with use of basal impedance.

Authors:  Aurelio Mauro; Marianna Franchina; Dario Consonni; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Simultaneous two-level esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with mild and severe esophagitis. Does probe position influence results of esophageal monitoring?

Authors:  A Ruiz-de-león; C Sevilla-Mantilla; J Pérez-de-la-Serna; C Taxonera; M Díaz Rubio
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications.

Authors:  Radha K Dhiman; Vivek A Saraswat; Subhash R Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Nigel J Trudgill; Daniel Sifrim; Rami Sweis; Mark Fullard; Kumar Basu; Mimi McCord; Michael Booth; John Hayman; Guy Boeckxstaens; Brian T Johnston; Nicola Ager; John De Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.