Literature DB >> 31839963

Lower oesophageal sphincter identification for gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: The step-up method revisited with use of basal impedance.

Aurelio Mauro1,2,3, Marianna Franchina1,2, Dario Consonni4, Roberto Penagini1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal manometry is the gold standard for accurate positioning of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) monitoring. The pH step-up method is not as accurate as oesophageal manometry and needs patients to be off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the impedance step-up method for lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) localisation.
Methods: A total of 100 patients who underwent 24-hour MII-pH monitoring were enrolled. High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed before MII-pH monitoring in order to locate the LOS by a different operator. The impedance step-up was defined as an increase of ≥50% with respect to gastric baseline. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc ) with 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) and Spearman's rho correlation coefficient were used when appropriate.
Results: The median impedance step-up was on average 0.8 cm caudal to the manometric upper border of the LOS. Agreement between two step-up impedance performances and inter-observer agreement were excellent (ρc  = 0.98 and 0.95), although the LOA ranges were wide (-2.4 to 4.0 cm). Impedance step-up performances were similar between patients off and on PPI. Conclusions: We have described an alternative new method for pH impedance probe positioning using impedance step-up. Although less accurate than HRM in locating the LOS, it has excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement. © Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PPI; gastroesophageal reflux disease; high-resolution manometry; pH impedance monitoring; step up

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31839963      PMCID: PMC6894004          DOI: 10.1177/2050640619860034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  25 in total

1.  Impedance characteristics of normal oesophageal motor function.

Authors:  Huan N Nguyen; Gerson R Domingues; Ron Winograd; Patrick Koppitz; Frank Lammert; Jiri Silny; Siegfried Matern
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.566

2.  Use of direct, endoscopic-guided measurements of mucosal impedance in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Elif Saritas Yuksel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Jerry Mabary; Robert T Kavitt; C Gaelyn Garrett; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Conclusions from an international consensus group.

Authors:  C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; J Keller; J E Pandolfino; D Sifrim; R Tatum; R Yadlapati; E Savarino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high-resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve.

Authors:  A Mauro; E Savarino; N De Bortoli; S Tolone; D Pugliese; M Franchina; C P Gyawali; R Penagini
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.

Authors:  B L Weusten; J M Roelofs; L M Akkermans; G P Van Berge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Endoscopic Mucosal Impedance Measurements Correlate With Eosinophilia and Dilation of Intercellular Spaces in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  David A Katzka; Karthik Ravi; Debra M Geno; Thomas C Smyrk; Prasad G Iyer; Jeffrey A Alexander; Jerry E Mabary; Michael Camilleri; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn.

Authors:  Arne Kandulski; Jochen Weigt; Carlos Caro; Doerthe Jechorek; Thomas Wex; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  pH probe positioning for 24-hour pH-metry by manometry or pH step-up.

Authors:  Christian Pehl; Ilona Boccali; Michael Hennig; Wolfgang Schepp
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 10.  Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.

Authors:  S Roman; C P Gyawali; E Savarino; R Yadlapati; F Zerbib; J Wu; M Vela; R Tutuian; R Tatum; D Sifrim; J Keller; M Fox; J E Pandolfino; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.