Literature DB >> 18069759

Accurate positioning of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter: agreement between manometry and pH step-up method in two patient positions.

Mehmet-Fatih Can1, Gokhan Yagci, Sadettin Cetiner, Mustafa Gulsen, Taner Yigit, Erkan Ozturk, Semih Gorgulu, Turgut Tufan.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the agreement between esophageal manometry and pH step-up method in two different patient positions.
METHODS: Eighteen subjects were included in the study. First, the distance from the nose to the proximal border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was measured manometrically. Then a different investigator, who was blinded to the results of the first study, measured the same distance using the pH step-up method, with the patient in both upright and supine positions. An assessment of agreement between the two techniques was performed.
RESULTS: In the supine position, the measurement of only one subject was outside the range accepted for correct positioning (< or = 3 cm distal or proximal to the LES). In the upright position, errors in measurement were recognized in five subjects. Bland-Altman plots revealed good agreement between measurements obtained manometrically and by the pH-step up method with the patient in the supine position.
CONCLUSION: In the case of nonavailability of manometric detection device, the pH step-up method can facilitate the positioning of the 24 h pH monitoring catheter with the patient in the supine position. This should increase the use of pH-metry in clinical practice for subjects with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease if our results are supported by further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069759      PMCID: PMC4171229          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i46.6197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  25 in total

1.  Effects of postural changes and vestibular lesions on diaphragm and rectus abdominis activity in awake cats.

Authors:  L A Cotter; H E Arendt; J G Jasko; C Sprando; S P Cass; B J Yates
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-07

2.  Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  H E Mattox; J E Richter; J W Sinclair; J E Price; L D Case
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The influence of postural changes on gastroesophageal reflux and barrier pressure in nonfasting individuals.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Jeske; Jan Borovicka; Achim von Goedecke; Christa Meyenberger; Thomas Heidegger; Arnulf Benzer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer.

Authors:  S Singh; J E Price; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  A simplified technique for accurate placement of ambulatory pH probes.

Authors:  K R DeVault; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Esophageal pH monitoring: are you sure that the electrode is properly placed?

Authors:  J Monés; P Clavé; F Mearin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux.

Authors:  A Anggiansah; K Sumboonnanonda; J Wang; J Linsell; P Hale; W J Owen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jin-Yan Luo; Lei Dong; Jun Gong; Ai-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Comparison of lower esophageal sphincter manometrics and gastroesophageal reflux measured by 24-hour pH recording.

Authors:  B B Kraus; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  Robert E Marsh; Christopher L Perdue; Ziad T Awad; Patrice Watson; Mohamed Selima; Richard E Davis; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of anatomical position on esophageal transit time: a biomagnetic diagnostic technique.

Authors:  Teodoro Cordova-Fraga; Modesto Sosa; Carlos Wiechers; Jose-Maria De la Roca-Chiapas; Alejandro Maldonado Moreles; Jesus Bernal-Alvarado; Raquel Huerta-Franco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Recurrent symptoms after fundoplication with a negative pH study--recurrent reflux or functional heartburn?

Authors:  Sarah K Thompson; Wang Cai; Glyn G Jamieson; Alison Y Zhang; Jennifer C Myers; Zoe E Parr; David I Watson; Jenny Persson; Gerald Holtmann; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Controlling on-demand gastric acidity in obese subjects: a randomized, controlled trial comparing a single dose of 20 mg rabeprazole and 20 mg omeprazole.

Authors:  Kafia Belhocine; Fabienne Vavasseur; Christelle Volteau; Laurent Flet; Yann Touchefeu; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  A comparative study of 22-channel water-perfusion system and solid-state system with 36-sensors in esophageal manometery.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Li-Ping Duan; Ying Ge; Zhi-Wei Xia; Zhi-Jie Xu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.