Literature DB >> 7628263

Simultaneous two-level esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with mild and severe esophagitis. Does probe position influence results of esophageal monitoring?

A Ruiz-de-león1, C Sevilla-Mantilla, J Pérez-de-la-Serna, C Taxonera, M Díaz Rubio.   

Abstract

Simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed in 10 patients (group 1) with normal distal acid exposure and in 40 patients (group 2) with pathological distal reflux. The probes were placed 5 and 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter to quantify variations of pH values that can be due to a displacement of pH sensor. In group 1 the median percent time with pH < 4 for total and upright monitoring periods and composite score were significantly lower at the proximal than the distal level. In group 2 all pH data were significantly lower at the proximal than the distal level. The patients with pathological reflux were subdivided into two subgroups based on endoscopic findings (mild and severe esophagitis). The patients with severe esophagitis showed a proximal acid reduction higher than in patients with mild esophagitis. Nine patients with mild esophagitis showed normal values at 10 cm, but all patients with severe esophagitis had abnormal proximal acid exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7628263     DOI: 10.1007/bf02285187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  7 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  H E Mattox; J E Richter; J W Sinclair; J E Price; L D Case
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode?

Authors:  A G Klauser; N E Schindlbeck; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer.

Authors:  S Singh; J E Price; J E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Alternative method of positioning the pH probe for oesophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  A Anggiansah; N Bright; M McCullagh; K Sumboonnanonda; W J Owen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.

Authors:  C Emde; A Garner; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux.

Authors:  A Anggiansah; K Sumboonnanonda; J Wang; J Linsell; P Hale; W J Owen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  [Physiological reflux in proximal esophagus (assessment with simultaneous pH monitoring in proximal and distal esophagus in healthy subjects].

Authors:  A Ruiz de León; M C Sevilla-Mantilla; J Pérez de la Serna; C Taxonera; J García-Cabezas; M Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.086

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Historical perspective of gastric acid inhibition.

Authors:  Manuel Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.