Literature DB >> 14978201

Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Dirk Jancke1, Wolfram Erlhagen, Gregor Schöner, Hubert R Dinse.   

Abstract

Psychophysical evidence in humans indicates that localization is different for stationary flashed and coherently moving objects. To address how the primary visual cortex represents object position we used a population approach that pools spiking activity of many neurones in cat area 17. In response to flashed stationary squares (0.4 deg) we obtained localized activity distributions in visual field coordinates, which we referred to as profiles across a 'population receptive field' (PRF). We here show how motion trajectories can be derived from activity across the PRF and how the representation of moving and flashed stimuli differs in position. We found that motion was represented by peaks of population activity that followed the stimulus with a speed-dependent lag. However, time-to-peak latencies were shorter by approximately 16 ms compared to the population responses to stationary flashes. In addition, motion representation showed a directional bias, as latencies were more reduced for peripheral-to-central motion compared to the opposite direction. We suggest that a moving stimulus provides 'preactivation' that allows more rapid processing than for a single flash event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14978201      PMCID: PMC1665003          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  45 in total

1.  Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness.

Authors:  D M Eagleman; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Directional asymmetry of neurons in cortical areas MT and MST projecting to the NOT-DTN in macaques.

Authors:  K-P Hoffmann; F Bremmer; A Thiele; C Distler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Comparative population analysis of cortical representations in parametric spaces of visual field and skin: a unifying role for nonlinear interactions as a basis for active information processing across modalities.

Authors:  H R Dinse; D Jancke
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; J M Alonso; R C Reid; L M Martinez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates.

Authors:  E Salinas; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina.

Authors:  S H Devries; D A Baylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex.

Authors:  A Grinvald; E E Lieke; R D Frostig; R Hildesheim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Velocity sensitivity mechanisms in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J Duysens; G A Orban; O Verbeke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  31 in total

1.  Perceived temporal asynchrony between sinusoidally modulated luminance and depth.

Authors:  Gojko Žaric; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Shigeaki Nishina; Peter De Weerd; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  An updated midline rule: visual callosal connections anticipate shape and motion in ongoing activity across the hemispheres.

Authors:  Christiane Peiker; Thomas Wunderle; David Eriksson; Anne Schmidt; Kerstin E Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Catching the voltage gradient-asymmetric boost of cortical spread generates motion signals across visual cortex: a brief review with special thanks to Amiram Grinvald.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.593

6.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Authors:  Tessel Blom; Daniel Feuerriegel; Philippa Johnson; Stefan Bode; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mapping hV4 and ventral occipital cortex: the venous eclipse.

Authors:  Jonathan Winawer; Hiroshi Horiguchi; Rory A Sayres; Kaoru Amano; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual field maps, population receptive field sizes, and visual field coverage in the human MT+ complex.

Authors:  Kaoru Amano; Brian A Wandell; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.