Literature DB >> 7056333

Velocity sensitivity mechanisms in cat visual cortex.

J Duysens, G A Orban, O Verbeke.   

Abstract

To understand why some cells in the visual cortex respond to high stimulus velocities while other fail to do so, a sample of 71 of such cells were examined for their responses to stationary presented stimuli as well as to moving edges or slits of different widths. When presented with stationary stimuli it was found that cells which respond best to slowly moving stimuli generally have tonic discharges, long time to peak latencies and often long minimal durations of stimulation. In contrast, cells which respond preferentially to fast stimuli have phasic discharges, short latencies and short critical durations of stimulation when presented with stationary flashed slits. In the latter type of cells the responses to very fast stimulus movement were abolished selectively when contrast and width of the stimulus were not optimal. A few cells exhibited a velocity-response (VR) curve with a central dip indicating good responsiveness to either slow or fast movement but little to medium velocities. These cells responded both phasically and tonically to stationary slits and the latency of the tonic and phasic responses at low and high velocities, respectively. It is suggested that the ability of phasic cells to respond to high velocities is linked to their limited need for temporal summation.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7056333     DOI: 10.1007/bf00235789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat.

Authors:  G H Henry
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-09-09       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Cell structure and function in the visual cortex of the cat.

Authors:  J P Kelly; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Receptive field analysis: responses to moving visual contours by single lateral geniculate neurones in the cat.

Authors:  B Dreher; K J Sanderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Excitatory responses of geniculate neurons of the cat.

Authors:  F H Baker; E R Sanseverino; Y Lamarre; G F Poggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Differential response of X and Y retinal ganglion cells to moving stimuli results from a difference in the surround mechanism.

Authors:  D I Hamasaki; H I Cohen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-02-11       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  STIMUL: stimulus control and multihistogram analysis of a single neurone recordings.

Authors:  H Maes; G A Orban
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Responses of single cells in cat's lateral geniculate nucleus and area 17 to the velocity of moving visual stimuli.

Authors:  R Hess; W Wolters
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is stimulus movement of particular importance in the functioning of cat visual cortex?

Authors:  J Duysens; G A Orban
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Influence of layer V of area 18 of the cat visual cortex on responses of cells in layer V of area 17 to stimuli of high velocity.

Authors:  J M Alonso; J Cudeiro; R Pérez; F Gonzalez; C Acuña
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.