Literature DB >> 32179666

Predictions drive neural representations of visual events ahead of incoming sensory information.

Tessel Blom1, Daniel Feuerriegel2, Philippa Johnson2, Stefan Bode2,3, Hinze Hogendoorn2,4.   

Abstract

The transmission of sensory information through the visual system takes time. As a result of these delays, the visual information available to the brain always lags behind the timing of events in the present moment. Compensating for these delays is crucial for functioning within dynamic environments, since interacting with a moving object (e.g., catching a ball) requires real-time localization of the object. One way the brain might achieve this is via prediction of anticipated events. Using time-resolved decoding of electroencephalographic (EEG) data, we demonstrate that the visual system represents the anticipated future position of a moving object, showing that predictive mechanisms activate the same neural representations as afferent sensory input. Importantly, this activation is evident before sensory input corresponding to the stimulus position is able to arrive. Finally, we demonstrate that, when predicted events do not eventuate, sensory information arrives too late to prevent the visual system from representing what was expected but never presented. Taken together, we demonstrate how the visual system can implement predictive mechanisms to preactivate sensory representations, and argue that this might allow it to compensate for its own temporal constraints, allowing us to interact with dynamic visual environments in real time.

Keywords:  neural delays; prediction; time-resolved decoding; visual system

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179666      PMCID: PMC7132318          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917777117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

Authors:  R P Rao; D H Ballard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Interpolation and extrapolation on the path of apparent motion.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn; Thomas A Carlson; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Expecting the unexpected: Temporal expectation increases the flash-grab effect.

Authors:  Kate M Coffey; Nika Adamian; Tessel Blom; Elle van Heusden; Patrick Cavanagh; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Michel F Failing; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays.

Authors:  Romi Nijhawan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 8.  Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Stewart Shipp; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Visual motion induces a forward prediction of spatial pattern.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy.

Authors:  Harriet Feldman; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Motion Extrapolation in Visual Processing: Lessons from 25 Years of Flash-Lag Debate.

Authors:  Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The nature of neural object representations during dynamic occlusion.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Denise Moerel; Anina N Rich; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.644

5.  Unraveling the Neural Mechanisms Which Encode Rapid Streams of Visual Input.

Authors:  William Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Predictive Feedback, Early Sensory Representations, and Fast Responses to Predicted Stimuli Depend on NMDA Receptors.

Authors:  Sounak Mohanta; Mohsen Afrasiabi; Cameron P Casey; Sean Tanabe; Michelle J Redinbaugh; Niranjan A Kambi; Jessica M Phillips; Daniel Polyakov; William Filbey; Joseph L Austerweil; Robert D Sanders; Yuri B Saalmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Motion extrapolation in the High-Phi illusion: Analogous but dissociable effects on perceived position and perceived motion.

Authors:  Philippa Johnson; Sidney Davies; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A dynamic noise background reveals perceptual motion extrapolation: The twinkle-goes illusion.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Time-Based Binding as a Solution to and a Limitation for Flexible Cognition.

Authors:  Mehdi Senoussi; Pieter Verbeke; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-24

10.  Confidence modulates the decodability of scene prediction during partially-observable maze exploration in humans.

Authors:  Wako Yoshida; Shin Ishii; Risa Katayama
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.