Literature DB >> 14970014

Axial loading during MR imaging can influence treatment decision for symptomatic spinal stenosis.

Akio Hiwatashi1, Barbro Danielson, Toshio Moritani, Robert S Bakos, Thomas G Rodenhause, Webster H Pilcher, Per-Lennart Westesson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that axial loading can narrow the spinal canal. However, the clinical significance is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the narrowing of the spinal canal with axial loading during MR imaging could influence treatment decision for spinal stenosis.
METHODS: Two hundred patients with clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis underwent routine MR imaging and then immediately underwent axially loaded MR imaging. We selected 20 of these patients because they had narrowing of the spinal canal shown on the axially loaded images. Three experienced neurosurgeons evaluated these 20 patients based on clinical information and routine MR images. The same neurosurgeons were then asked for second treatment decisions based on the same clinical information but with axially loaded MR images.
RESULTS: Axial loading during MR imaging of the lumbar spine can influence neurosurgeons in their treatment decisions for symptomatic spinal stenosis. For this selected group of patients, all three neurosurgeons changed their treatment decision from conservative management to decompressive surgery for five patients when shown the axially loaded MR images. For two other patients, two neurosurgeons changed their treatment decisions, and for three additional patients, one neurosurgeon changed his treatment decision, all based on the axially loaded MR images. Treatment was not changed from surgical to medical management for any of the patients when shown the axially loaded images.
CONCLUSION: In selected patients with spinal stenosis and apparent narrowing of the spinal canal shown by axially loaded MR imaging, the additional information gained from this technique can influence experienced neurosurgeons in their treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14970014      PMCID: PMC7974596     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  11 in total

1.  Changes in cross-sectional measurements of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramina as a function of body position: in vivo studies on an open-configuration MR system.

Authors:  M R Schmid; G Stucki; S Duewell; S Wildermuth; B Romanowski; J Hodler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  B Danielson; J Willén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading.

Authors:  B H Nowicki; V M Haughton; T A Schmidt; T H Lim; H S An; L H Riley; L Yu; J W Hong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises.

Authors:  A Nachemson; G Elfström
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl       Date:  1970

5.  The diagnostic effect from axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders.

Authors:  J Willén; B Danielson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  J Willén; B Danielson; A Gaulitz; T Niklason; N Schönström; T Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging?

Authors:  D Weishaupt; M R Schmid; M Zanetti; N Boos; B Romanowski; R O Kissling; J Dvorak; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  O Sortland; B Magnaes; T Hauge
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1977

10.  Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B I Danielson; J Willén; A Gaulitz; T Niklason; T H Hansson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.990

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Dynamic lumbar spinal stenosis : the usefulness of axial loaded MRI in preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Byungjoo Jung; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-09-30

Review 3.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Daryl Sybert; Tim Law; Brian Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  MRI of weight bearing and movement.

Authors:  L M Shapiro; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Kanji Sasaki; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Haruka Shimoda; Ishii Keiji; Takao Homma
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-30

7.  Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

Authors:  H Kanno; H Ozawa; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI.

Authors:  Kuo-Yuan Huang; Ruey-Mo Lin; Yung-Ling Lee; Jenq-Daw Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes.

Authors:  Umberto Tarantino; Ezio Fanucci; Riccardo Iundusi; Monica Celi; Simone Altobelli; Elena Gasbarra; Giovanni Simonetti; Guglielmo Manenti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-16

10.  Correlation of lateral stenosis in MRI with symptoms, walking capacity and EMG findings in patients with surgically confirmed lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Pekka Kuittinen; Petri Sipola; Timo Juhani Aalto; Sara Määttä; Anita Parviainen; Tapani Saari; Sanna Sinikallio; Sakari Savolainen; Veli Turunen; Heikki Kröger; Olavi Airaksinen; Ville Leinonen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.