Literature DB >> 26564439

Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

H Kanno1, H Ozawa2, Y Koizumi3, N Morozumi3, T Aizawa2, E Itoi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Axial-loaded MR imaging, which simulates the spinal canal in a standing position, demonstrates reductions of the dural sac cross-sectional area in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no useful conventional MR imaging finding for predicting a reduction in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial-loaded MR imaging. Previous studies have shown that increased facet fluid is associated with the spinal instability detected during positional changes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlations between facet fluid and dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial-loaded MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 93 patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis, the dural sac cross-sectional area was measured by using axial images of conventional and axial-loaded MR imaging. Changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area induced by axial loading were calculated. The correlation between the facet fluid width measured on conventional MR imaging and the change in dural sac cross-sectional area was analyzed. The change in the dural sac cross-sectional area was compared between the intervertebral levels with and without the facet fluid width that was over the cutoff value determined in this study.
RESULTS: The dural sac cross-sectional area was significantly smaller on axial-loaded MR imaging than on conventional MR imaging. The facet fluid width significantly correlated with the change in the dural sac cross-sectional area (r = 0.73, P < .001). The change in the dural sac cross-sectional area at the intervertebral level with the facet fluid width over the cutoff value was significantly greater than that at the other level.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased facet fluid on conventional MR imaging is highly predictive of the dynamic reduction of dural sac cross-sectional area detected on axial-loaded MR imaging in the clinical assessment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
© 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26564439      PMCID: PMC7960158          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis.

Authors:  C Martina Lohman; Kaj Tallroth; Jyrki A Kettunen; Karl-August Lindgren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Tommy Hansson; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Hanna Hebelka; Arne Gaulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Axial loaded MRI of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Saifuddin; S Blease; E MacSweeney
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Smaller facet effusion in association with restabilization at the time of operation in Japanese patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yosuke Oishi; Masaaki Murase; Yoshihiro Hayashi; Takayuki Ogawa; Jun-ichi Hamawaki
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-01

5.  Total sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar canal stenosis accompanied by intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Hidekazu Suzuki; Kenji Endo; Hiroto Kobayashi; Hidetoshi Tanaka; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Does lumbar facet fluid detected on magnetic resonance imaging correlate with radiographic instability in patients with degenerative lumbar disease?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Joon Y Lee; Mustafa Khan; James A Ulibarri; Chadi Tannoury; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Imaging correlation of the degree of degenerative L4-5 spondylolisthesis with the corresponding amount of facet fluid.

Authors:  Bo Young Cho; Judith A Murovic; Jon Park
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11

9.  Lumbar segmental mobility according to the grade of the disc, the facet joint, the muscle, and the ligament pathology by using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Min Ho Kong; Yuichiro Morishita; Wubing He; Masashi Miyazaki; Haihong Zhang; Guizhong Wu; Henry J Hymanson; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Hamanishi; N Matukura; M Fujita; M Tomihara; S Tanaka
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1994-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  The association between clinical symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis and MRI axial imaging findings.

Authors:  Yuki Fushimi; Koji Otani; Ryoji Tominaga; Masataka Nakamura; Miho Sekiguchi; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-11

2.  Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Young Su Lim; Jong-Uk Mun; Mi Sook Seo; Bo-Hyun Sang; Yun-Sic Bang; Keum Nae Kang; Jin Woo Koh; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.