Literature DB >> 11725242

Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.

B Danielson1, J Willén.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: For this study, 43 asymptomatic individuals underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in both supine psoas-relaxed position and supine axial compression in extension. The change in dural cross-sectional area between positions at each disc level was calculated.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of axial loading on asymptomatic individuals, as compared with the effect on patients who have clinical signs of lumbar spinal canal stenosis, and to assess the effect that different magnitude and duration of the applied load have on the dural cross-sectional area. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative changes in the spine are found in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. A study of patients with suspected clinical lumbar spine encroachment examined in both psoas-relaxed position and axial compression in extension with computed tomographic myelography or magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine is reported. A significant decrease in dural cross-sectional area was found, respectively, in 80% and 76% of the patients.
METHODS: The study subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging examinations in both psoas-relaxed position and axial compression in extension. The examination of the subject under axial compression in extension was performed with the lumbar spine in a supine position using a compression device. Degenerative changes in and adjacent to the spinal canal were registered. The dural cross-sectional areas were determined for psoas-relaxed position and axial compression in extension, then compared. In seven reexamined individuals, the dural cross-sectional area was calculated after an axial load corresponding to 25% and 50% of their body weight and a loading time of 5 to 60 minutes.
RESULTS: A significant decrease in dural cross-sectional area from psoas-relaxed position to axial compression in extension was found in 24 individuals (56%), most frequently at L4-L5, and increasingly with age. In four individuals (5 disc levels), a decrease in dural cross-sectional area to less than 100 mm2 from psoas-relaxed position to axial compression in extension was found. In seven reexamined individuals, a significant decrease in dural cross-sectional area was found: in five after 5 minutes load of 25% of their body weight, and in two with 50% of their body weight.
CONCLUSIONS: Using magnetic resonance imaging, a significant decrease in dural cross-sectional area after axial loading was found less frequently in asymptomatic than in symptomatic subjects. The decrease was more frequent at L4-L5, and increasingly with age. The load should be 50% of the subject's body weight applied for at least 5 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11725242     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Axial loading during MR imaging can influence treatment decision for symptomatic spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Akio Hiwatashi; Barbro Danielson; Toshio Moritani; Robert S Bakos; Thomas G Rodenhause; Webster H Pilcher; Per-Lennart Westesson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Tommy Hansson; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Hanna Hebelka; Arne Gaulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kanbara; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The influence of knee bolster on lumbar spinal stenosis parameters on MR images.

Authors:  Azaria Simonovich; Anna Nagar Osherov; Lina Linov; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Dynamic lumbar spinal stenosis : the usefulness of axial loaded MRI in preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Byungjoo Jung; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-09-30

7.  Internal three-dimensional strains in human intervertebral discs under axial compression quantified noninvasively by magnetic resonance imaging and image registration.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; John M Peloquin; Gang Song; Nick J Tustison; Sung M Moon; Alexander C Wright; Edward J Vresilovic; James C Gee; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Comparison between pain at discography and morphological disc changes at axial loaded MRI in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Hanna Hebelka; Helena Brisby; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Daryl Sybert; Tim Law; Brian Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Cutting-edge imaging of the spine.

Authors:  A Talia Vertinsky; Michael V Krasnokutsky; Michael Augustin; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.