Literature DB >> 19526378

Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI.

Kuo-Yuan Huang1, Ruey-Mo Lin, Yung-Ling Lee, Jenq-Daw Li.   

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the factors related to the disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using axially loaded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of axial loading on the morphology of the spine and the spinal canal in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis of L4-5 and to correlate morphologic changes to their disability and physical functions. From March 2003 to January 2004, 32 consecutive cases (26 females, 6 males) with degenerative L4-5 spondylolisthesis, grade 1-2, intermittent claudication, and low back pain without sciatica were included in this study. All patients underwent unloaded and axially loaded MRI of the lumbo-sacral spine in supine position to elucidate the morphological findings and to measure the parameters of MRI, including disc height (DH), sagittal translation (ST), segmental angulation (SA), dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) at L4-5, and lumbar lordotic angles (LLA) at L1-5 between the unloaded and axially loaded condition. Each patient's disability was evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire, and physical functioning (PF) was evaluated by the Physical Function scale proposed by Stucki et al. (Spine 21:796-803, 1996). Three patients were excluded due to the presence of neurologic symptoms found with the axially loaded MRI. Finally, a total of 29 (5 males, 24 females) consecutive patients were included in this study. Comparisons and correlations were done to determine which parameters were critical to the patient's disability and PF. The morphologies of the lumbar spine changed after axially loaded MRI. In six of our patients, we observed adjacent segment degeneration (4 L3-L4 and 2 L5-S1) coexisting with degenerative spondylolisthesis of L4-L5 under axially loaded MRI. The mean values of the SA under pre-load and post-load were 7.14 degrees and 5.90 degrees at L4-L5 (listhetic level), respectively. The mean values of the LLA under pre-load and post-load were 37.03 degrees and 39.28 degrees , respectively. There were significant correlations only between the ODI, PF, and the difference of SA, and between PF and the post-loaded LLA. The changes in SA (L4-L5) during axial loading were well correlated to the ODI and PF scores. In addition, the LLA (L1-L5) under axial loading was well correlated to the PF of patients with degenerative L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. We suggest that the angular instability of the intervertebral disc may play a more important role than neurological compression in the pathogenesis of disability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526378      PMCID: PMC2899437          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1059-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain.

Authors:  F P MORGAN; T KING
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1957-02

2.  Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation?

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Aritetsu Kanemura; Koichi Kasahara; Keizo Sato; Akira Kurihara; Shinichi Yoshiya; Kotaro Nishida; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Minoru Doita
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-08

3.  Dynamic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: diagnosis with axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Colin Nnadi; Asif Saifuddin; Emer Macsweeney; Adrian Casey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals. Have we been measuring instability properly?

Authors:  S D Boden; S W Wiesel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  G Stucki; L Daltroy; M H Liang; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; T H Lim; H S An; N Tanaka; C H Jeon; G B Andersson; V M Haughton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  J Willén; B Danielson; A Gaulitz; T Niklason; N Schönström; T Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  A J Caputy; A J Luessenhop
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measurements.

Authors:  J M Fritz; A Delitto; W C Welch; R E Erhard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Disc degeneration and angular movement of the lumbar spine: comparative study using plain and flexion-extension radiography and discography.

Authors:  J Soini; I Antti-Poika; K Tallroth; Y T Konttinen; V Honkanen; S Santavirta
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-06
View more
  16 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Geometry of the vertebral bodies and the intervertebral discs in lumbar segments adjacent to spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: pilot study.

Authors:  Ella Been; Ling Li; David J Hunter; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Motion characteristics of the vertebral segments with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Shaobai Wang; Zongmiao Wan; Won Man Park; Qun Xia; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Functional and quantitative magnetic resonance myelography of symptomatic stenoses of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Knut Eberhardt; Oliver Ganslandt; Andreas Stadlbauer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Pelvic retroversion is the key protective mechanism of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Sibei Li; Zhaomin Zheng; Jiranru Wang; Huafeng Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Acquired spondylolysis and spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Farzam Vazifehdan; Vasilios G Karantzoulis; Vasilios G Igoumenou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-22

7.  Quantitative evaluation of the lumbosacral sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Serik K Makirov; Andrew A Yuz; Mohammed T Jahaf; Anastasia A Nikulina
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12-02

8.  In Vivo Characteristics of Nondegenerated Adjacent Segment Intervertebral Foramina in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease During Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Thomas D Cha; Gregory Moore; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Weiye Zhong; Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; James D Kang; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Risk factors for lumbar intervertebral disc height narrowing: a population-based longitudinal study in the elderly.

Authors:  Koji Akeda; Tomomi Yamada; Nozomu Inoue; Akinobu Nishimura; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Young Su Lim; Jong-Uk Mun; Mi Sook Seo; Bo-Hyun Sang; Yun-Sic Bang; Keum Nae Kang; Jin Woo Koh; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.