Literature DB >> 3629399

Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study.

L Penning, J T Wilmink.   

Abstract

In 12 patients with myelographic evidence of bilateral root involvement at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 levels postmyelographic computerized tomography (CT) studies were performed in flexion and extension. They showed concentric narrowing of the spinal canal in extension and widening with relief of nerve root involvement in flexion. This could be attributed to the presence of marked degenerative hypertrophy of the facet joints, narrowing the available space for dural sac and emerging root sleeves. In extension of the lumbar spine, bulging of the disc toward the hypertrophic facets causes a pincers mechanism at the anterolateral angles of the spinal canal with the risk of bilateral root compression. This mechanism is enhanced in these cases by marked dorsal indentation of the dural sac because of anterior movement of the dorsal fat pad in extension. The authors believe that the radiologically described mechanism forms the anatomic basis of neurogenic claudication and posture-dependent sciatica.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3629399     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  28 in total

1.  Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; Luke Lin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Axial loading during MR imaging can influence treatment decision for symptomatic spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Akio Hiwatashi; Barbro Danielson; Toshio Moritani; Robert S Bakos; Thomas G Rodenhause; Webster H Pilcher; Per-Lennart Westesson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Authors:  Hasan Oğuz; Funda Levendoğlu; Tunç Cevat Oğün; Aysenur Tantuğ
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski; Stuart A Callary; Christopher J Colloca; Victor Kosmopoulos; Deed Harrison; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

7.  Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Siddarth M Shah; Yau Hong Ng; Vinodh Kumar Pannierselvam; Sudeep Dasde; Liang Shen
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

8.  Foraminal changes with distraction and compression of the L4/5 and L5/S1 segments.

Authors:  T Humke; D Grob; W Grauer; A Sandler; J Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Adjacent double-nerve root contributions in unilateral lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; M D Kang; W E Rothfus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.