Literature DB >> 21029084

Coverage and preventive screening.

Daniella Meeker1, Geoffrey F Joyce, Jesse Malkin, Steven M Teutsch, Anne C Haddix, Dana P Goldman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Preventive care has been shown as a high-value health care service. Many employers now offer expanded coverage of preventive care to encourage utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether expanding coverage is an effective means to encourage utilization.
DESIGN: Comparison of screening rates before and after introduction of deductible-free coverage.
SETTING: People insured through large corporations between 2002 and 2006. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) enrollees from an employer introducing deductible-free coverage, and a control group enrolled in a PPO from a second employer with no policy change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted probability of endoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), lipid screens, mammography, and Papanicolaou (pap) smears. INTERVENTION: Introduction of first-dollar coverage (FDC) of preventive services in 2003.
RESULTS: After adjusting for demographics and secular trends, there were between 23 and 78 additional uses per 1,000 eligible patients of covered preventive screens (lipid screens, pap smears, mammograms, and FOBT), with no significant changes in the control group or in a service without FDC (endoscopy).
CONCLUSIONS: FDC improves utilization modestly among healthy individuals, particularly those in lower deductible plans. Compliance with guidelines can be encouraged by lowering out-of-pocket costs, but patients' predisposing characteristics merit attention. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21029084      PMCID: PMC3034268          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01188.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  14 in total

1.  Does health insurance coverage of office visits influence colorectal cancer testing?

Authors:  Reuben K Varghese; Carol Friedman; Faruque Ahmed; Adele L Franks; Marsha Manning; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Screening for sickle cell disease in newborns: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Cancer: improving early detection and prevention. A community practice randomised trial.

Authors:  A J Dietrich; G T O'Connor; A Keller; P A Carney; D Levy; F S Whaley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

4.  A test of two interventions to improve compliance with scheduled mammography appointments.

Authors:  K L Margolis; T C Menart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Association between health insurance coverage of office visit and cancer screening among women.

Authors:  Carol Friedman; Faruque Ahmed; Adele Franks; Tom Weatherup; Marsha Manning; April Vance; Betsy L Thompson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird; D Fordham; J E Rodnick; E H Osborn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-26

8.  The effect of office visit copayments on preventive care services in an HMO.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; L Grothaus; E H Wagner
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Impact of Medicare coverage on basic clinical services for previously uninsured adults.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ellen Meara; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Moving beyond the typologies of managed care: the example of health plan predictors of screening mammography.

Authors:  Sherilyn Tye; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  11 in total

1.  The long term effects of "Consumer-Directed" health plans on preventive care use.

Authors:  Matthew D Eisenberg; Amelia M Haviland; Ateev Mehrotra; Peter J Huckfeldt; Neeraj Sood
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The influence of deductible health plans on receipt of the human papillomavirus vaccine series.

Authors:  Douglas W Roblin; Debra P Ritzwoller; Daniel I Rees; Nikki M Carroll; Anping Chang; Matthew F Daley
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Mammography Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries After Elimination of Cost Sharing.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Gery P Guy; Janet S de Moor; Florence K Tangka
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Determinants of receipt of recommended preventive services: implications for the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Stacey McMorrow; Genevieve M Kenney; Dana Goin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Jacqueline W Miller; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; Erica Breslau; Meredith L Shoemaker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Screening Mammography for Free: Impact of Eliminating Cost Sharing on Cancer Screening Rates.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Jie Huang; Bruce Fireman; Vicki Fung; Scott Gazelle; Mary Beth Landrum; Michael Chernew; Joseph P Newhouse; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Current and (Potential) Future Effects of the Affordable Care Act on HIV Prevention.

Authors:  Abigail H Viall; Eugene McCray; Jonathan Mermin; Pascale Wortley
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-12-22

9.  Has recommended preventive service use increased after elimination of cost-sharing as part of the Affordable Care Act in the United States?

Authors:  Xuesong Han; K Robin Yabroff; Gery P Guy; Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  The effect of the Affordable Care Act on patient out-of-pocket cost and use of preventive cancer screenings in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Maria Steenland; Anna Sinaiko; Amy Glynn; Therese Fitzgerald; Jessica Cohen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.