Literature DB >> 24077760

Mammography utilization among Black and White Medicare beneficiaries in high breast cancer mortality US counties.

Mandeep K Virk-Baker, Michelle Y Martin, Robert S Levine, Xin Wang, Tim R Nagy, Maria Pisu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities in US breast cancer mortality between older Black and White women have increased in the last 20 years. Regular mammography use is important for early detection and treatment: its utilization among older Blacks especially in counties with high Black mortality is of interest, but its extent and determinants are unknown.
METHODS: We used Medicare claims for Black and White women 65–74 years old in 203 counties with the highest Black breast cancer mortality. Outcomes over 6 years were as follows: ever mammogram, i.e., C 1 screening mammogram, and regular mammogram, i.e., C 3 mammograms. With logistic regressions, we examined the independent effect of race on screening controlling for individual- and county-level factors.
RESULTS: Of 406,602 beneficiaries, 17 % were Black. Ever and regular mammogram was significantly lower among Blacks (51.6 vs. 56.9 %; 32.9 vs. 43.1 %, respectively). Controlling for covariates, including use of cervical cancer screening, flu shots, or lipids tests, Black women were more likely to have ever mammogram (OR 1.23, CI 1.20–1.25), but not regular mammogram (OR 0.95, CI 0.93–0.97) than White women. County-level managed care penetration was negatively associated with ever and regular mammograms.
CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare enrollees from these counties, breast cancer screening was low. Black women had same or better odds of screening than White women. Some health care factors, e.g., managed care, were negatively associated with screening. Further studies on the determinants of mammography utilization in older women from these counties are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077760      PMCID: PMC3955601          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0295-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  43 in total

1.  The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Kathryn A Phillips; Jennifer S Haas; Su-Ying Liang; Dean Sonneborn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The influence of health status, age, and race on screening mammography in elderly women.

Authors:  Julie P W Bynum; Joel B Braunstein; Phoebe Sharkey; Kathleen Haddad; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-10-10

3.  Breast cancer screening and socioeconomic status--35 metropolitan areas, 2000 and 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Understanding reversals of association between cancer screening and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Michelle L Rogers; Gregory M Dominick; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Chris Quale; Philip W Chu; Robert Rosenberg; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Racial differences in knowledge, attitudes, and cancer screening practices among a triracial rural population.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie Dickinson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Demographic and health factors associated with mammography utilization.

Authors:  Kirsten Barrett; Jeffrey Legg
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

9.  Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicole Lurie; Linn Abraham; Rachel Ballard Barbash; Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark Dignan; William E Barlow; Cherry M Beasley; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Relationship of social support and social burden to repeated breast cancer screening in the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Catherine R Messina; Dorothy S Lane; Karen Glanz; Delia Smith West; Vicky Taylor; William Frishman; Lynda Powell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  4 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Incidence by Stage Before and After Change in Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Yong-Fang Kuo; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Delays in breast cancer care by race and sexual orientation: Results from a national survey with diverse women in the United States.

Authors:  Tonia C Poteat; Mary Anne Adams; Jowanna Malone; Sophia Geffen; Naomi Greene; Michael Nodzenski; Alexandre G Lockhart; I-Hsuan Su; Lorraine T Dean
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 6.921

3.  Racial disparities in the utilization of preventive health services among older women with early-stage endometrial cancer enrolled in Medicare.

Authors:  Jovana Y Martin; Melissa A Schiff; Noel S Weiss; Renata R Urban
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Patients characteristics related to screening mammography cancellation and rescheduling rates during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Sona A Chikarmane; Camden P Bay; Catherine S Giess
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.605

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.