Literature DB >> 15533185

The effect of area HMO market share on cancer screening.

Laurence C Baker1, Kathryn A Phillips, Jennifer S Haas, Su-Ying Liang, Dean Sonneborn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Managed care may have widespread impacts on health care delivery for all patients in the areas where they operate. We examine the relationship between area managed care activity and screening for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer among patients enrolled in more managed care plans and patients who are enrolled in less managed plans. DATA AND METHODS: Data on cancer screening from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were linked to data on health maintenance organization (HMO) and preferred provider organization (PPO) market share and HMO competition at the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) level. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between area managed care prevalence and the use of mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap smear, and prostate cancer screening in the past two years, controlling for important covariates.
RESULTS: Among all patients, increases in area-level HMO market share are associated with increases in the appropriate use of mammography, clinical breast exam, and Pap smear (OR for high relative to low managed care areas are 1.75, p < .01, for mammography, 1.58, p < .05, for clinical breast exam, and 1.71, p < .01, for Pap smear). In analyses of subgroups, the relationship is significant only for individuals who are enrolled in the nonmanaged plans; there is no relationship for individuals in more managed plans. No relationship is observed between area HMO market share and prostate cancer screening in any analysis. Neither the level of competition between area HMOs nor area PPO market share is associated with screening rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Area-level managed care activity can influence preventive care treatment patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533185      PMCID: PMC1361096          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00316.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

1.  Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services.

Authors:  G Solanki; H H Schauffler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Determinants of managed care penetration.

Authors:  D Dranove; C J Simon; W D White
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The effect of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: evidence from Medicare.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Health maintenance organization penetration and the practice location choices of new physicians: a study of large metropolitan areas in the United States.

Authors:  J J Escarce; D Polsky; G D Wozniak; M V Pauly; P R Kletke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The NCQA's quality compass: evaluating managed care in the United States.

Authors:  J W Thompson; J Bost; F Ahmed; C E Ingalls; C Sennett
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Type of health care coverage and the likelihood of being screened for cancer.

Authors:  N P Gordon; T G Rundall; L Parker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  A L Potosky; N Breen; B I Graubard; P E Parsons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Association of managed care market share and health expenditures for fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  23 in total

1.  Managed care market share and primary treatment for cancer.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Ellen Meara; Patricia A Ganz; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Laws requiring health plans to provide direct access to obstetricians and gynecologists, and use of cancer screening by women.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; Jia Chan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Was the drop in mammography rates in 2005 associated with the drop in hormone therapy use?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Jasmin A Tiro; Helen I Meissner; Timothy S McNeel; Susan A Sabatino; Florence K Tangka; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Managed Health Care and Utilization of Fecal Occult Blood Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: a National Database Study.

Authors:  Daniel Bushyhead; Paul Fishman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Modeling the impact of Medicare Advantage payment cuts on ambulatory care sensitive and elective hospitalizations.

Authors:  Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Trends in end-of-life cancer care in the Medicare program.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Jane Hall; Craig E Pollack; Kerin Adelson; Elizabeth H Bradley; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Managed care and cancer outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Thomas N Chirikos; Kristen J Wells; Ellen P McCarthy; Long H Ngo; Donglin Li; Reed E Drews; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Authors:  Lee Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; John Boos; Nancy Lozano-Gracia; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.