Literature DB >> 14767630

Fooling the brain into thinking it sees both hands moving enhances bimanual spatial coupling.

Elizabeth A Franz1, Tamara Packman.   

Abstract

This study examined the hypothesis that the mirror reflection of one hand's movement directly influences motor output of the other (hidden) hand, during performance of bimanual drawing. A mirror was placed between the two hands during bimanual circle drawing, with one hand and its reflection visible and the other hand hidden. Bimanual spatial coupling was enhanced by the mirror reflection, as shown by measures of circle size. Effects of the mirror reflection differed significantly from effects of vision to one hand alone, but did not differ from a control task performed in full vision. There was no evidence of a consistent phase lead of the visible hand, which indicates that the observed effects on spatial coupling were immediate and not based on time-consuming feedback processes. We argue that visual mirror symmetry fools the brain into believing it sees both hands moving rather than one. Consequently, the spatial properties of movement of the two hands become more similar through a process that is virtually automatic. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767630     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1831-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  The effect of callosotomy on novel versus familiar bimanual actions: a neural dissociation between controlled and automatic processes?

Authors:  E A Franz; K E Waldie; M J Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Bimanual coupling in amputees with phantom limbs.

Authors:  E A Franz; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Attentional distribution of task paramters to the two hands during bimanual performance of right- and left-handers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Does handedness determine which hand leads in a bimanual task?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Andrew Rowse; Barbara Ballantine
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task.

Authors:  E A Franz; H N Zelaznik; G McCabe
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1991-09

6.  Between-limb asynchronies during bimanual coordination: effects of manual dominance and attentional cueing.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; K Jardin; R Meulenbroek
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The dynamics of bimanual circle drawing.

Authors:  R G Carson; J Thomas; J J Summers; M R Walters; A Semjen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-08

Review 9.  Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements.

Authors:  N Stucchi; P Viviani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Robert McCormick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus.

Authors:  Christian Dohle; Klaus Martin Stephan; Jakob T Valvoda; Omid Hosseiny; Lutz Tellmann; Torsten Kuhlen; Rüdiger J Seitz; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Altered visual feedback modulates cortical excitability in a mirror-box-like paradigm.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cristina Russo; Cesare Valerio Parise; Irene Ferrario; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical responses to the mirror box illusion: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Line Lindhardt Egsgaard; Laura Petrini; Giselle Christoffersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The positive effect of mirror visual feedback on arm control in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy is dependent on which arm is viewed.

Authors:  Ana R P Smorenburg; Annick Ledebt; Max G Feltham; Frederik J A Deconinck; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Hendrikus J Snijders; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-05

8.  Referred sensations elicited by video-mediated mirroring of hands.

Authors:  Simon Hoermann; Elizabeth A Franz; Holger Regenbrecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implication of the anterior commissure in the allocation of attention to action.

Authors:  Taylor J Winter; Elizabeth A Franz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-19

10.  Mirror Visual Feedback to Improve Bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Gaia Bonassi; Elisa Pelosin; Carla Ogliastro; Cecilia Cerulli; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Laura Avanzino
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.